Grand Rapids: Judge Johnston handed down a 16 month to 8 year prison sentence to Michael Patrick Stackhouse who killed a cat in a most brutal manner. I won’t go over the killing but he did it and was quickly found guilty by the jury because the killing was carried out in plain view of a number of spectators.
The sentence is good. It is a longish sentence for killing a cat because countless thousands of cats are killed illegally without the slightest hint of a possibility of the perpetrator being punished.
As one commentator says: “Baby steps”, meaning the sentence might change the way courts deal with animal cruelty cases.
However, a reason why he was sentenced harshly is because Stackhouse has a long criminal record. He is an unpleasant and cruel person who begged the judge to sentence him by ordering him to work in the Kent County Animal Shelter. You’re kidding Mr Stackhouse. You shouldn’t be within a mile of an animal at any time.
The judge accepted that if cats and pets where recognised by the law as sentient beings and not inanimate objects he would have been able to increase the sentence.
“Luna is treated under the law as if she were a table lamp or some other piece of personal property,” said Johnston
The judge suggested it was perhaps time to amend the law. Not only should the law accept companion animals as sentient, feeling beings but also recognise that there is an emotional connection between animal and human. Both suffer if an animal is abused or killed.
This should be included as a factor in sentencing and compensation should be ordered so that the criminal has to pay compensation to the human victim – the cat’s caretaker.
One day in a more civilised world it might well be like that. Judge Johnston advanced the rights of the domestic cat a miniscule amount but he did the right thing.
Gotta’ love this judge.
I love it when they show such compassion for the victims and push through the punitive max as much as possible. He seems fully aware that animals aren’t “property” but is bound by the current laws unfortunately.
I’m not sure what I would do if someone referred to any cat that I care for as a lamp, chair, or car. But, I’m sure it wouldn’t be good.
Judges don’t normal voice their opinion on the law but he has and it’s good. There is a dire need to advance the law in respect of its recognition of the status of animals.
The judge suggested it was perhaps time to amend the law. Not only should the law accept companion animals as sentient, feeling beings but also recognise that there is an emotional connection between animal and human. Both suffer if an animal is abused or killed.
Finally,someone gets it! If only Florida would think the same.
I wonder how many judges feel the same way. Why can’t the law recognise cats and dogs as living creatures for heaven’s sake?
Geri, I know it’s slow, but I can see a lot of changes going on in our state.
The whole state isn’t Marion County. We’ll have to hit our local government in the heads with shovels before they get it here. But, I’ve been budgeting for them. LOL!
Judges should not be “making” the laws. The legislature must pass the laws and the judges should enforce it. Animal rights organizations and the public should lobby their local legislatures and congressmen/congresswomen to make the laws recognizing companion animals as sentient. This may be easier to do than you realize since most states will uphold the Last Will and Testament of those who leave money (or fortunes) to their companion animals. With our critters recognized in this way, then it is a short step to being fully recognized as sentient.
Agreed that judges can’t make the law as in ordinances but they can make common law (case law). However, a judge can encourage the politicians to create law by making judicious and well considered remarks about the current state of affairs.
Judges have influence.
We need more of this kind.
WOWWWW THIS JUDGE SHOULD BE SAINTED!
🙂 I like the passion. More judges should say the same thing. It is way beyond the time when companion animals were treated a living creatures. The law is well behind public opinion.