The Bengal tiger is mismanaged


There is no doubt that the Bengal tiger is mismanaged despite the best of intentions. Or worse, is the mismanagement deliberate? The Bengal tiger occupies India and India has at least two high profile conservation organisations:

  • Wildlife Institute of India (WII) at Dehra Dun set up in 1982
  • Project Tiger was incorporated in 1973

I do not wish to be critical and this is not a criticism of the Indian people. Also it is worth bearing in mind that the home of the Florida panther or cougar is equally badly mismanaged by Americans (probably worse so). So mismanagement of the wild cats is not unique to Asian countries far from it. In the UK large wildlife including the lynx was extirpated hundreds or thousands of years ago. The UK was ahead at the time.bengal tiger

But if I feel helpless, frustrated and angry by the latest revelations of the mismanagement of the Bengal tiger it must have similar effects around the world. The professional conservationist must be pulling their hair out.

I also find it odd that the Wikipedia author of the article on Project Tiger says this:

Project Tiger is a wildlife conservation project initiated in India in 1972 to protect the Bengal Tigers. It was launched on April 1, 1973 and has become one of the most successful wildlife conservation ventures

Successful…….? The objective is to protect tigers. They have had since 1973 to achieve that. Reserves were set up to protect tigers. Reserves are defined by Wikipedia as:

A nature reserve (natural reserve, nature preserve, natural preserve) is a protected area of importance for wildlife…

They go on to say:

The first ever all-India tiger census was conducted in 1972 which revealed the existence of only 1827 tigers………….a 2008 census held by Government of India revealed that the tiger population had dropped to 1,411

Since the inception of Project Tiger and countless millions spent (a lot of charity money from hard working tax payers) the Bengal tiger population has fallen by 23% to date! Success or failure – you decide.

sariska reserve India This is compounded by the latest news. One of India’s most famous tiger “reserves” (I am not sure I would call it that because no conservation takes place on it in relation to the tiger – quite the opposite) is the Sariska Reserve. It is at the centre of the Project Tiger conservation program. Yet it was discovered in 2005 that all of Sariska’s tigers had been killed (by poachers, I presume). There is little point in having a reserve that cannot be, or is not protected.

That was bad enough. But in order to rectify a  wrong it was decided last year (2008 – this article written June 2009) to import fresh tiger stock into the reserve in the expectation that they would breed and produce more tigers. Three tigers were flown in. The trouble is that the tiger experts at the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) failed to carry out a very simple procedure to ensure that the tigers flown in where good breeding stock and unrelated. A simple DNA test would have achieved that. It now transpires that:

  1. the two females are sisters
  2. the male could be a brother (test due out at the time of this post) and
  3. the father was the only male that occupied the territory from where the three relocated tigers came from and WII knew this.

It would seem then that the experts relocated tigers that were almost certainly closely related but even failed to test for that. Maybe they didn’t test for it because they knew that they were related? Maybe there is a hidden agenda designed to engineer failure in the Bengal tiger conservation programme for the sake of business profit. Reserves are valuable properties from a commercial standpoint. The errors are so basic that it points to that.

One last point. It is pointless putting three tigers on a reserve that is hundreds of square miles in size (866 km²) and therefore cannot be policed while China is buying tiger body parts at a very high price making poaching extremely lucrative.

When they imported the three tigers did they think about making changes to their protection? I don’t know but I doubt it. What point therefore in doing it based on the history of poaching? The root cause must be tackled and people shy away from that: the tiger body part business must be stopped.

From the Bengal tiger is mismanaged to Wild Cat Species

The Bengal tiger is mismanaged – Sources:

The Bengal tiger is mismanaged – Photo bottom: Published under Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic. Photo top: Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please try and upload photos that are small in size of max 500px width and 50 KB size. Large images typical of most default settings on digital cameras may fail to upload. Thanks. Comment rules: (1) respect others (2) threatening, harassing, bullying, insulting and being rude to others is forbidden (3) advocating cat cruelty is forbidden (4) trolls (I know who they are) must use real name and upload a photo of themselves. Enforcement: (1) inappropriate comments are deleted before publication and (2) commenters who demonstrate a desire to flout the rules are banned. Failure to comply with (4) results in non-publication. Lastly, please avoid adding links because spam software regards comments with links as spam and holds them in the spam folder. I delete the spam folder contents daily.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.