Abusing a raccoon is less serious than abusing a cat. Discuss.
avatar

According to a judge in Miami, Florida, USA, if a person cruelly abuses a raccoon, that person is committing a lesser crime than if he is abusing a cat and should be punished to a lesser extent.

Criminal case of animal abuse

I’m not sure that the judge is correct in her assessment. In fact, I cannot see a reason why abusing a raccoon is different to abusing a cat except for one thing. If the cat is ‘owned’ as opposed to feral then the owner will suffer emotional distress if they are aware of what happened. However, this does not apply in this case.

The 19-year-old man whose name is Roberto Hernandez was accused in court through his prosecutor of setting fire to a cat in a cage and then feeding the carcass to is dogs. Yes, it sounds horribly disgusting and hard to bear but I have to report it in order to explain this article.

His defence was that the animal was a rabid raccoon. The Miami-Dade circuit judge watched a video (yes it was videoed) and decided that Hernandez was telling the truth.

She decided as well that he did not deserve jail time but stressed that the raccoon should not be treated in that manner. I’m not sure why she bothered to say that because it’s obvious.

Hernandez was originally charged with a felony (for those outside America this is a more serious crime than a misdemeanour). The judge issued a “withhold of adjudication” instead of a conviction in order that he will not be considered a felon. He was sentenced to 100 hours of community service and five years probation.

I return to the statement in the title. On the basis that both raccoons and cats suffer the same degree of pain, distress and fear when abused in the manner described, and on the basis that animal welfare protection laws protect wild animals and domestic animals to the same extent (they should, baring animals labelled ‘pests’ or invasive species), why did the judge hand down a lesser punishment to this man?

Update: I am told that raccoons are ‘nuisance animals’ in Florida which means they can be killed but that does not mean they can be killed inhumanely and therefore this act is still animal cruelty as far as I am concerned. Drowning is considered a sub-optimal way of ‘euthanising’ animals in a previous raccoon killing case. There is no way on earth that setting fire to a raccoon can be considered euthanasia or anything other than downright cruel and a crime. That’s my thinking on the subject.

I think that it sends the wrong signal to people who have a desire to abuse animals. You cannot treat wild animals as having less value than domesticated animals. And the fact that he said he thought the raccoon was rabid is irrelevant. There was no evidence of this and therefore she cannot take it as a fact. I’m surprised also by the way that the parties to this matter were unable to tell whether the animal was a raccoon or a cat.

What do you think? Remember these are my personal views. I expect people to have different opinions.

P.S. It looks like he got the idea from ISIS. Remember the caged men burnt to death?

Source: CBS47 Fox30

FB comments (see below)
This entry was posted in animal abuse and tagged , , , by Michael Broad. Bookmark the permalink.

About Michael Broad

Michael is retired! He retired at age 57 and at Aug 2018 is approaching 70. He worked in many jobs. The last job he did was as a solicitor practicing general law. He loves animals and is passionate about animal welfare. He also loves photography and nature. He hates animal abuse. He has owned and managed this site since 2007. There are around 13k pages so please use the custom search facility!

Comments

Abusing a raccoon is less serious than abusing a cat. Discuss. — 8 Comments

  1. That judge is a shame. The man should have been in more trouble because he claimed the victim was rabid and then fed a rabid carcass to his dogs, which could have spread the disease. Either way the punishment should fit the crime. Burning a live animal to death should be dealt with severely.

  2. I cannot watch any of these videos. I just cannot bear it. All animals are sentient beings who feel pain.

    By definition, this quote from Wikipedia: “Animal euthanasia (euthanasia from Greek: εὐθανασία; “good death”) is the act of putting an animal to death or allowing it to die by withholding extreme medical measures…Euthanasia methods are designed to cause minimal pain and distress.”

    Drowning and and other cruel methods of killing an animal obviously inflict pain and distress. Therefore, anyone who ends an animal’s life in a merciless way is guilty of an extreme act of animal abuse, and cannot be considered as employing a form of euthanasia. 😱😠😭🐾

    • Laurie, I checked out the story. Does it change my assessment that this is animal cruelty and a crime. Raccoons may be nuisance animals in Florida allowing people to kill them without prosecution but surely it has to be humane killing – a version of euthanasia. Setting fire to a raccoon is not humane and is cruel.

  3. This is one of those cases that will stick with me. This judge failed to protect the people as well as the animals here, besides giving animal lovers everywhere the finger. I can’t watch the video. I already have nightmare images burned in my brain. What are the judges going to do when people take the administration of justice into their own hands?

    • Well said. I deliberately did not publish the video here. It is far too horrible. There is an ISIS element to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Please try and upload photos that are small in size of max 500px width and 50 KB size. Large images typical of most default settings on digital cameras may fail to upload. Thanks. Comment rules: (1) respect others (2) threatening, harassing, bullying, insulting and being rude to others is forbidden (3) advocating cat cruelty is forbidden (4) trolls (I know who they are) must use real name and upload a photo of themselves. Enforcement: (1) inappropriate comments are deleted before publication and (2) commenters who demonstrate a desire to flout the rules are banned. Failure to comply with (4) results in non-publication. Lastly, please avoid adding links because spam software regards comments with links as spam and holds them in the spam folder. I delete the spam folder contents daily.