Of course this site is fundamentally about cats but everything we do that affects us also affects our cat companions as we wholly create their world. That’s the overlap and it justifies me briefly touching on AI and how it is ‘dismantling our world’ according to Laurie Anderson, a US avant-garde artist and musician. She is in the news today and she is right about AI which can work wonders for the betterment of humankind but in today’s world which is arguably ‘going wrong’ with an increase in autocracy and a drift to war, AI will increasingly be used by ‘bad actors’ who’ll use it for personal gain but for purposes which damage the world. Bad actors think short term and about personal gain without looking at the bigger picture which today means protecting the planet and society in general.
My personal view currently is that humankind is not ready to successfully harness AI for benefit. I can see it being used to dismantle and even destroy the world that we know. You can combine that with global warming, another human behavioral problem. Think of it as a double whammy effect: misused AI and the burning of fossil fuels. A toxic combo to destroy this fragile and glorious blue gem of a planet in the vastness of the black universe.
What happens is that the tech guys end up inadvertently changing the world at a fundamental level. Tech does run the world and alpha males with bad intent use tech for personal gain without concern for society in general.
Here is an infographic which attempts to summarise the pros and cons of AI in this context.
Here is an expansion of the above five bullet points:
There is a profound question: “Are humans in general ready to use AI to good effect or are humans unable to manage it properly such that it severely damages our world? Has technology outstripped the ability of humans to manage it?”
The answer depends on how humanity chooses to adapt to the rapid advancements in AI technology. There are reasons for both optimism and concern. Let’s break this down:
Humans’ Readiness to Use AI for Good
- Potential for Positive Impact:
- AI has demonstrated immense potential to address global challenges, such as improving healthcare, optimizing resource use for sustainability, and creating new opportunities in education and economic growth.
- The key lies in collaboration, ethical design, and a focus on fairness, transparency, and inclusivity. With proper frameworks, AI can augment human capacities, rather than replace them.
- Examples of Good Usage:
- Medicine: AI aids in diagnosing diseases, discovering drugs, and personalizing treatments.
- Environment: Machine learning is helping to combat climate change through data-driven analysis of carbon footprints and renewable energy optimization.
- Education: AI tools are making education more accessible to marginalized populations.
- Regulation and Awareness:
- Some governments, organizations, and researchers are actively working on guidelines to ensure ethical AI deployment (e.g., the EU’s AI Act, ethical frameworks by organizations like OpenAI or UNESCO).
Challenges: Human Inability to Manage AI
- Miscaligned Incentives:
- AI development is often driven by competition and profit motives, which can lead to irresponsible applications, such as surveillance technologies, deepfakes, and the spread of misinformation.
- Lack of transparency in how AI systems function (e.g., opaque algorithms) exacerbates these problems.
- Skill and Knowledge Gap:
- Many policymakers, businesses, and individuals lack a deep understanding of AI and its implications, making it difficult to implement appropriate governance or use AI wisely.
- Power Concentration:
- AI’s benefits and risks are unevenly distributed. Companies and nations with significant AI capabilities wield disproportionate influence, risking global inequality or misuse of the technology.
- Unintended Consequences:
- Poorly designed or mismanaged AI systems can reinforce biases, harm vulnerable groups, and contribute to systemic issues, such as unemployment or privacy violations.
Has Technology Outstripped Humanity’s Ability to Manage It?
This is a recurring question in human history. New technologies—whether nuclear power, the internet, or genetic engineering—often seem to outpace humanity’s ability to fully control them initially. However:
- Hope: Over time, societies generally develop norms, regulations, and institutions to manage these technologies. For example, international agreements have been critical in nuclear non-proliferation.
- Risk: AI’s scale and speed make it unique. Its ability to self-learn, adapt, and amplify impact creates an urgency that humanity hasn’t faced with earlier technologies.
Key Considerations for the Future
- Education and Awareness:
- Improving AI literacy across society, from policymakers to the general public, is essential for informed decision-making.
- Regulatory Frameworks:
- Governments and global bodies must implement strong, adaptable laws to manage AI’s risks while encouraging innovation.
- Collaboration:
- Multidisciplinary and international cooperation can align AI development with shared human values.
- Ethical Principles:
- Embedding ethics into AI systems and holding developers accountable for unintended consequences are critical to responsible use.
Conclusion
While AI poses significant challenges, humans have historically risen to the task of managing transformative technologies. Whether we succeed this time depends on our willingness to act collectively, ethically, and wisely. If mismanagement persists, AI could indeed exacerbate inequalities, harm societal structures, and damage the environment. Conversely, with foresight, regulation, and ethical implementation, AI could be one of humanity’s greatest tools for progress.
In my view, the trouble is that today the world is increasingly febrile and fragmented. And the concept of autocratic rule is gaining in popularity. Bad actors are taking charge and they could harness AI for personal gain.
Today’s increasingly fragmented and volatile global landscape, coupled with the rise of autocratic governance in some regions, poses significant challenges for the ethical and equitable deployment of AI. Bad actors—whether they are individuals, corporations, or governments—have already demonstrated how emerging technologies, including AI, can be weaponized for personal or political gain. This dynamic creates a dangerous feedback loop where technology exacerbates instability and division.
Key Risks of AI in a Fragmented World
- AI as a Tool for Control and Oppression:
- Surveillance States: Autocratic regimes are already using AI for mass surveillance, predictive policing, and control over dissent. Technologies like facial recognition, social credit systems, and data analysis of social behaviors can stifle freedoms.
- Propaganda and Misinformation: AI-powered tools can amplify disinformation campaigns, making it easier for authoritarian governments or bad actors to manipulate public opinion and destabilize democratic societies.
- Erosion of Global Cooperation:
- The geopolitical competition over AI development (e.g., U.S.-China rivalry) undermines collective action and creates a race-to-the-bottom dynamic. Each player may prioritize dominance over ethics, resulting in the proliferation of unregulated AI applications.
- This fragmentation diminishes the likelihood of establishing globally consistent standards or frameworks for AI governance.
- Exploitation by Non-State Actors:
- Terrorist groups, organized crime syndicates, or rogue hackers can use AI to create advanced cyberattacks, deepfakes, or autonomous weapons, posing new threats to global security.
- The widespread availability of generative AI lowers the bar for creating harmful content or conducting sophisticated scams.
- AI Amplifying Inequality:
- In autocratic or corrupt systems, AI might further entrench inequality, with elites using it to concentrate power while the majority face increasing unemployment, privacy invasions, and marginalization.
Why AI is Particularly Dangerous in the Hands of Autocrats
- Scale and Precision:
- AI enables autocrats to surveil and suppress opposition with unprecedented precision and efficiency. Technologies like sentiment analysis of social media or predictive modeling of protests allow for preemptive crackdowns.
- Opaque Decision-Making:
- Autocratic leaders can leverage AI’s complexity to justify harmful decisions as being “data-driven” or unavoidable, creating a veneer of legitimacy.
- Global Spillover:
- The tools developed in autocratic regimes often spill into the wider world through technology exports. For example, surveillance technologies built for authoritarian states have been sold to other governments for similar purposes.
The Role of Bad Actors in Weakening Democratic Resilience
- Erosion of Trust:
- Widespread use of AI-generated misinformation and deepfakes can undermine trust in institutions, elections, and media.
- Economic Manipulation:
- Autocrats may use AI to manipulate markets, disrupt supply chains, or exploit vulnerabilities in digital systems to destabilize competitors.
- Weaponizing Polarization:
- AI-driven social media algorithms amplify divisive content, deepening polarization and weakening democratic unity.
What Can Be Done?
Despite these risks, there are steps humanity can take to mitigate the misuse of AI by bad actors:
- Establish International Norms and Agreements:
- Just as nuclear weapons prompted international treaties like the Non-Proliferation Treaty, AI requires a global framework to limit its misuse. These could include bans on autonomous weapons, limits on mass surveillance, and agreements on ethical standards.
- Such agreements would need to involve not just democracies but also reluctant autocracies, which may require incentives or pressure.
- Strengthen Democracies:
- Democracies need to improve resilience by addressing inequality, polarization, and declining trust in institutions. This includes regulating AI in ways that promote fairness, transparency, and inclusivity.
- Education systems must focus on digital literacy and critical thinking to counter the spread of misinformation.
- Limit the Export of Dangerous AI Technologies:
- Democracies can implement stricter controls on exporting AI technologies that enable surveillance or oppression. This would also require monitoring and accountability for companies developing such tools.
- Encourage Transparency and Accountability in AI:
- Mandating explainable AI systems, where algorithms’ decisions can be audited and understood, reduces the risk of misuse.
- Developers and organizations must be held accountable for the downstream effects of their AI systems.
- Invest in Defensive Capabilities:
- Democracies need to develop robust tools to identify and counter deepfakes, disinformation, and cyberattacks. AI can also be used to bolster cybersecurity and protect critical infrastructure.
Conclusion
The febrile, fragmented world you describe is fertile ground for AI misuse, especially in the hands of autocratic leaders and bad actors. However, recognizing these dangers is the first step toward addressing them. It will require unprecedented levels of collaboration, vigilance, and innovation to ensure AI serves humanity as a whole rather than becoming a tool for division and control.
While the task is daunting, history shows that humanity can rally to meet such challenges—if there is enough political will and societal awareness to demand change. Without proactive measures, however, AI risks amplifying existing threats and becoming a powerful enabler of autocratic and divisive agendas.
More: AI
