Animal shelter killed all 46 hoarded cats on day they were rescued and described as a ‘killer of innocent animals’

State investigators of Hamilton Township Animal Shelter & Adoption Center found a catalogue of two dozen deficiencies. They also discovered that the shelter killed all 46 cats recovered from a hoarder on the day they were rescued.

The Township Health Official, Jeff Plunkett, and the mayor, Kelly Yaede, have defended the shelter vigorously. The mayor called the criticisms ‘gutter politics’.

Hamilton Township animal shelter

File photo.

“I could not be more proud of the men and the women who work in that shelter on a daily basis, their commitment and compassion for the animals in that shelter,” Plunkett said. “In any private facility or public facility, there is always room for improvement…..”

Regarding the 46 cats killed, Plunkett, said that all 46 were extremely ill and euthanasia was appropriate. As a follower of animal shelter news in the US, I have never heard of such an event occurring before. It is highly unlikely that all the cats in a hoarding situation are so unwell as to be beyond recovery and that killing them is justified.

In addition, the shelter appears to have been euthanising pets to their owner’s order. Plunkett said that most euthanised animals were terminally ill and when the shelter euthanised pets it was because the owner was unable to afford a veterinarian’s charges. The shelter charged $100 (apparently half a vet’s charges). The people at the shelter euthanising animals were not vets or certified by a licensed vet. They received verbal authorisation over the phone by a vet. Comment: euthanising pets on their owner’s request without question runs counter to the objects and goals of an animal shelter.

The law requires a 7 day holding period before an animal is euthanised per an owner request. This was being violated. The shelter has subsequently ceased providing ‘euthanasia services’ or accepting unadaptable pets.

Example of other failings, per the inspection, at the shelter include:

  • Poor record keeping. This was paper based. Euthanasia records did not match e.g. a euthanised cat was adopted.
  • Sixty-seven millilitres of euthanasia drugs were missing.
  • Cages were not being cleaned and disinfected daily.
  • No medical records, treatment orders or medication logs.
  • Some meds had expired five years ago.
  • No isolation room from sick dogs.
  • Checks of microchips was carried out slackly. Microchip checks should be carried out 3 times but the shelter did it once on intake.
  • Animals earmarked for euthanasia were not weighed resulting in incorrect dosages of drugs being administered.

Yaede defended the shelter by saying that the report did not find a single example of animal cruelty or abuse and most of the ‘clerical errors’ had been rectified. The shelter was allowed to run after the inspection indicating that that the inspectors considered the procedures adequate.

Source: New Jersey 101.5 (nj1015.com)



Facebook Discussion
This entry was posted in Cat shelters and tagged , , by Michael Broad. Bookmark the permalink.

About Michael Broad

Michael is retired! He retired at age 57 and at Aug 2018 is approaching 70. He worked in many jobs. The last job he did was as a solicitor practicing general law. He loves animals and is passionate about animal welfare. He also loves photography and nature. He hates animal abuse. He has owned and managed this site since 2007. There are around 13k pages so please use the custom search facility!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Please try and upload photos that are small in size of max 500px width and 50 KB size. Large images typical of most default settings on digital cameras may fail to upload. Thanks. Comment rules: (1) respect others (2) threatening, harassing, bullying, insulting and being rude to others is forbidden (3) advocating cat cruelty is forbidden (4) trolls (I know who they are) must use real name and upload a photo of themselves. Enforcement: (1) inappropriate comments are deleted before publication and (2) commenters who demonstrate a desire to flout the rules are banned. Failure to comply with (4) results in non-publication. Lastly, please avoid adding links because spam software regards comments with links as spam and holds them in the spam folder. I delete the spam folder contents daily.