Any institution that treats females as breeding machines is anti-feminist

“End the sexual exploitation of female animals…Any institution that treats females as breeding machines is anti-feminist” writes a Peta (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) author on their blog. Peta has complained bitterly on their blog about the misogyny and anti-feminist nature of dog breeding. You could say the same thing about cat breeding.

Any institution that treats females as breeding machines is anti-feminist

Photo top in public domain on Pinterest and bottom under a CC license.

Dog shows are accused by Peta of contributing to misogyny. If they are right the same thing can be said about cat shows. They say that dog breeders still treat female dogs as moneymaking commodities.

“And unlike many animal shelters, most breeders don’t screen their buyers, instead handing over a living, thinking, feeling animal to anyone with a credit card.”

They say that dog breeders force females to bear litter after litter of puppies which are taken away and sold as quickly as possible.

Once again the same thing can be said about cat breeders. The question therefore is are cat shows contributing to misogyny? A lot of people will think it is absurd that you can equate dog and cat breeding to human sexual exploitation.

However, if like Peta you see animals as equals to humans and you see animals as being exploited by humans without adequate protection and adequate rights then it is feasible to argue that cat breeders are anti-feminist despite the fact that most of them are women because they are abusing female cats. Or is it an abuse of a female cat or dog to let her get pregnant over and over again?

In defense, most cat and dog breeders would argue that they treat their cats well and that they have to comply with the relevant animal welfare law where they live. The law regards cat breeding as acceptable. Therefore arguably Peta are being a extreme in their assessment.

For my part, however, I agree with them because they also say, quite correctly, that:

“No breeding and selling of companion animals can be considered ‘responsible’….while there were millions of pets in shelters”.

If you care about animal welfare you’ll see the Peta argument. Cat breeding is inherently objectionable for many reasons, if you care. And I hate to say it because I don’t want to upset breeders. It depends on your attitude towards animals. Do you see them as ‘just cats’ or ‘just dogs’ or as a bona fide family member with equal rights. If it’s the latter you should agree with Peta.

FB comments (see below)
This entry was posted in Animal Rights and tagged , by Michael Broad. Bookmark the permalink.

About Michael Broad

Michael is retired! He retired at age 57 and at Aug 2018 is approaching 70. He worked in many jobs. The last job he did was as a solicitor practicing general law. He loves animals and is passionate about animal welfare. He also loves photography and nature. He hates animal abuse. He has owned and managed this site since 2007. There are around 13k pages so please use the custom search facility!


Any institution that treats females as breeding machines is anti-feminist — 4 Comments

  1. Inspite of how well the females are treated and loved, it is medically unhealthy to force them to have litter after litter. They need to have time for their bodies to recover before being forced to get pregnant again. Most breeders don’t allow that. Therefore, it IS abuse. And, don’t forget the emotional trauma of having your children stolen from you!

    • Good comment. I think breeders have got used to female cats being pregnant etc.. and lost what is normal.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please try and upload photos that are small in size of max 500px width and 50 KB size. Large images typical of most default settings on digital cameras may fail to upload. Thanks. Comment rules: (1) respect others (2) threatening, harassing, bullying, insulting and being rude to others is forbidden (3) advocating cat cruelty is forbidden (4) trolls (I know who they are) must use real name and upload a photo of themselves. Enforcement: (1) inappropriate comments are deleted before publication and (2) commenters who demonstrate a desire to flout the rules are banned. Failure to comply with (4) results in non-publication. Lastly, please avoid adding links because spam software regards comments with links as spam and holds them in the spam folder. I delete the spam folder contents daily.