HomeFeral CatsAustralian Feral Cat Evolving Into A True Wildcat?


Australian Feral Cat Evolving Into A True Wildcat? — 14 Comments

  1. I want a giant hydrid cats to scare scavenger mercants from my door. Because fair natural selection in evolving they must be more healthier than any domestic overbreeded pets.
    My aunt tamed young feral cat but it never wanted to live indoors but was really friendly towards people. He got very huge head and paws. It was love at first sight.

  2. I won’t be surprised if a few American breeders capture a few “Australian Feral Cats” and breed them into a new cat species, “THE AUSTRALIAN FERAL”.The cat shown in the photo is huge and would definitely be a cat fanciers envy if preferring wild cat hybrids like the “Bengal cat’ and the “Savannah cat”. I really wouldn’t be surprised if in another few years a “Australian feral’ is paraded in the cat shows.The common cat now feral akin to the common rabbit was an introduced species by early immigrants to Australia and both are considered pests, although for different reasons.


      That is a very clever idea. Americans like large cats. A feral cat that is nearly a wild cat which is then made domestic again and then “refined” to make it more pretty is right up the street of the American cat fancy.

  3. Hi Valley Girl. Good point. They appear to be evolving forwards into a new wildcat type subspecies, bigger than existing related cats. Having said that I have genetically pure Turkish cats called the Ankara kedisi. The males can weigh up to 9kg and presently I have 2 that weigh over 6 kg. But those Australian ferals get huge whilst living under harsh conditions without the benefits of de-worming or any veterinary care, no hot and cold running water, or room service like my cats get. It’s interesting to note that feral Australian cats also have some DNA evidence of Siamese-like cats introduced from SE Asia much earlier than the first European settlers.

  4. Interesting article, Michael. What intrigues me is the size of the cats. I wonder how many generations it has take for them to evolve to this size. Natural selection seems to be favoring a bigger and bigger version of the “basic” domestic cat, without changing the “looks”, otherwise. I mean the basic proportions. (Am I correct on the latter point?) My knowledge, such as it is, indicates that when cats F.f. were domesticated (as you say to benefit of cat and human) they were about the size of what we now call the domestic cat. So, intriguing to me as a biologist is that the cats are not “reverting” to what they were before (small but wild). Course, it depends on time frame here.

    Hope above makes a sort of sense. Just scratching my head, and thinking hmmm…..

    • You make complete sense. Although this ginger, super feral cat in the picture probably weighs about 20 pounds or so at a guess. That is at the top end of the weight range of the European wildcat. So, I am not sure they are evolving to be bigger than the wildcat although it is possible and if so it is probably because prey source is good and they have been left alone. They could evolve into a new subspecies of wildcat that is larger than the original. I think the Aussies should be happy about that as it would give them their very first Australian wild cat species.

  5. Messybeast.com covers the matter of cat predation in Australia. The coverage is very thorough and it will take considerable time to read it carefully. It also covers the matter of surveys which are designed only to provide convincing but flawed “proof” and inaccurate figures. What is not borne in mind by most people is that Australia has been protected from evolution that took place in the rest of the world. Species that would normally have become extinct because of a whole host of deficiencies were able to survive and prosper in Australia due to sparsity of predators. The Dingo only arrived in Australia 3,500 years ago from SE Asia but we do not know what affect they had on the marsupial population except that many (those that survived to this day)do not seem to have been endangered by it. The case for cats endangering the survivability of native species is not at all clear since their prey is mostly imported species, rabbits, sparrows, rats, mice, etc., which compete with native species for food and habitat. http://www.messybeast.com/auspredicament.htm

  6. I have wondered from time to time if feral cats could actually ever completely revert to wildcat status. I think this is very possible and in this case, very probably. As you said in your article, there is a lot of room for these super-feral’s to thrive in. Great article!

    • I am pleased that you see the possibility. It is something that is rarely, if ever, said but it makes sense. Feral cats are an intermediate state between domestic and wild cat. If feral cats are left alone long enough and have territory that is devoid of people and plenty of prey it seems natural that, over many years, they will end up being a new sort of wild cat species.

  7. A very good article Michael. I am pleased that my observations have struck a chord.
    I imagine these new Australian “wildcats” may have a beneficial effect on the ecology. Creepy-crawlies abound in the outback which are not much use for anything except food. They eat a lot of seeds and small plants which are thus prevented from growing up into good cover and removing potential food and habitat for birds. I hope the aborigines eventually realise that and leave the cats alone. I wonder if there is any evidence of cat predation on Koalas and other small animals. Domestic cats do not hunt or kill domestic fowl. It’s not that far- fetched to suppose these new “wildcats” are averse to killing the strange marsupials of Australia. Research needs to be done on this. We can’t be guided by wide-sweeping accusations of cats killing-off native species without reliable observations. That wildly exaggerated Smithsonian report shows the need for a serious study , not the unfounded claims of cat haters.

    • Thanks Harvey.

      We can’t be guided by wide-sweeping accusations of cats killing-off native species without reliable observations.

      I think this is a very important statement. We need a proper, objective, assessment that includes people. Some scientists are too eager to blame cats. Like all people, some scientists don’t like cats and it shows in their work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Note: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified.