British cat owners do not feel responsible for their cats killing wildlife

Cat looking at bird outside

Cat looking at bird outside. Photo: Reddit.com

British cat owners have a variety of responses to their cat’s hunting behaviour. Some are very concerned about the impact that their cat makes on wildlife through hunting. Others are less concerned. However, both groups prioritise the welfare of their cat over the negative environmental impact that might occur through hunting. This means that they let their cat roam freely because they believe it is better for their cat’s welfare and allows them to behave more naturally.

A study found that many cat owners in Britain are concerned about their cat wandering outside but they allow it to happen in the interests of the cat’s welfare which is somewhat ironic because a cat’s welfare is compromised when they roam outside because of the dangers of doing so. There are conflicting objectives.

In Britain, hunting and bringing mice and birds into the household is seen as a natural behaviour beyond the control of the cat’s owner. It is argued that this needs to be challenged.

See no way to stop feline hunting except for keeping cats inside

Cat owners who were particularly concerned about the hunting of wildlife by their cat and who wanted to limit it felt that they could not do so without keeping their cat indoors which they rejected as an option. They were unaware of alternative options such as wearing a brightly coloured collar. If they did know about this preventative measure, it might still be doubtful that they would take up the option (my thoughts).

Not all domestic cats hunt

Owners in the survey provided a wide range of answers with respect to questions about their cat hunting. They said that some cats are keen hunters, catching many birds and small mammals weekly while others were unconcerned and stayed indoors most of the time.

This is useful for people like me because when ornithologists make estimates about predation of birds by domestic cats they take the entire cat population as a starting point when they should take a proportion of it. We do not have an accurate figure which tells us the percentage of cats that hunt, incidentally.

There appears to be some speciesism. Killing mice was seen as pest control but killing birds was seen as something to be avoided.

Owners do not take responsibility for the cat’s hunting

Perhaps the most important conclusion that can be drawn from the study is that cat owners in Britain do not, in general, take responsibility for their cat’s hunting habits. They are concerned about their cat’s behavior but accept it as part of natural behaviour. Clearly, more can be done, I would argue (as would wildlife conservation groups) to educate cat owners in Britain to take more responsibility.

As for myself, I built my cat a back garden enclosure but this does not stop him attacking birds. It kept him safer but did not address the issue of bird predation.

Microchipping

The Times newspaper suggests that cats should be microchipped so that owners can take responsibility for the birds they kill. They are citing the study that I’m referring to. I don’t see how micro-chipping cats can help owners take responsibility for their cat’s hunting. Cat owners already know how many birds and mammals their cat kills. If you wanted to force responsibility on cat owners you would have to have some sort of obligatory database matching up identified individual cats with the animals that they have killed. Simply micro-chipping cats would not achieve this.

Need for change

The study recommended that more research should be carried out to get cat owners to take more responsibility for their cats and to work with conservation organisations to find solutions to minimising domestic cat predation. Today, there is a greater awareness of the impact of cats killing birds. The environment has become more important to people.

More work needs to be done as well on assessing the impact on bird populations by domestic cats. We need more figures and more accurate data. The RSPB, some time ago, said that there was no evidence to suggest that domestic cats endangered bird species populations but no doubt ornithologists would disagree. The RSPCA say that there is a debate as to whether hunting had a detrimental effect on bird populations. However, Sam Watson said that it was likely to cause suffering.

I have to agree that cat owners need to take more responsibility for the behaviour of the domestic cat companions in Britain. This includes predation on birds and mammals.

The study

The study by Exeter University interviewed 48 cat owners from urban, suburban and rural areas in Oxfordshire and Cornwall, UK. The study has been published in the journal People and Nature. It was sponsored by the conservation charity Songbird Survival. They say that hunting can be reduced with bells and bright collars. It appears that they want cat owners to take more responsibility for pet ownership as it would benefit wildlife and cats.

Facebook Discussion

Comments

British cat owners do not feel responsible for their cats killing wildlife — 2 Comments

  1. Since we secured our garden to protect our cats, our resident hunter has not caught one bird. We don’t feed birds in the garden either. A few mice have been caught and an occasional frog. I am not going to feign horror/disgust at the natural behaviour of cats. My hunter does miss his avian prey.

    Hunting is a natural behaviour.

    I wonder how much the RSPCA consider the suffering of livestock animals on their “assured” farms or in abattoirs? Do they consider the suffering of wild/domesticated avians kept in hellish isolation in small cages in homes everywhere?

    Collars of any colour & jingly bells do not deter hunting in any way. Collars are dangerous and can cause significant injury or death by strangulation. Jingly bells hurt the cat’s ears as they are high pitched. Hunting cats learn to move deftly to avoid the bells ringing when they hunt. The bells make most of their noise when a cat is going about their normal business.

    I don’t believe that domestic cats have a significant impact on wild life (apart from hybridisation of the Scottish Wild Cat) Ths is the responsibility of humans, not the fault of domestic cats

    I think human arrogance & hypocrisy have a massive, detrimental impact on the well being of every living organism on earth, including themselves

    ….but far easier to blame & persecute the domestic cat isn’t it.

    • Thank you. And my house cats all had bells as tiny babies and they all learned to walk without making a sound. The bird thing is all about cat hate. The feral cat issue is a 100% man made disaster mostly for the innocent felines who are born and die in misery often at the hands of cruelty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Please try and upload photos that are small in size of max 500px width and 50 KB size. Large images typical of most default settings on digital cameras may fail to upload. Thanks. Comment rules: (1) respect others (2) threatening, harassing, bullying, insulting and being rude to others is forbidden (3) advocating cat cruelty is forbidden (4) trolls (I know who they are) must use real name and upload a photo of themselves. Enforcement: (1) inappropriate comments are deleted before publication and (2) commenters who demonstrate a desire to flout the rules are banned. Failure to comply with (4) results in non-publication. Lastly, please avoid adding links because spam software regards comments with links as spam and holds them in the spam folder. I delete the spam folder contents daily.