HomeHuman to cat relationshipCats ProtectionCats Protection and the Lost Icelandic Bank Deposits

Comments

Cats Protection and the Lost Icelandic Bank Deposits — 18 Comments

  1. Yes, RuthAKA, I bullied Michael into reinstating the archives section here. I threatened to wave my magic wand and turn him into a mouse for Charlie.

  2. This is why it’s best to help local branches, we know for sure that any donations to ours will be safe in the hands of our co-ordinator Marion and used wisely.

  3. “CATS CHARITIES” should have entrusted me to invest their money! I can’t believe that a “CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION” invested “11.4 Million Pounds” in a single bank ? It doesn’t take a chartered accountant’s degree to be a astute investor or a average investor.Any bank or business that offers higher interest than the normal is liable to failure or risk in the future, a gamblers bet.After retiring from the shipping Industry i live on my investments and a reasonable comfortable life.Its not how much money you earn but how you invest your money to make your money work for you that is the secret of successful investments.Feel sad that a “Cat Charity” organization lost such a huge sum of money in a single investment.Hope they didn’t invest in the “Bernie.Madoff Mutual funds” ?

    • I agree. It was foolish to invest in Icelandic banks. It was the time of “greed” in the UK. People chasing too much money. Quick fixes. Easy money. As I recall most Icelandic banks went bust and the whole country went bust with the banks. Nowadays Iceland makes its money through fishing and they are still messing around hunting wales and overfishing, illegally as far as I am concerned.

      • Yes – Iceland is worse than Japan. Actually they kill Minke whales and export them to Japans stockpiles.

        Basically nobody except a few out of touch older generations eat the stuff and these two countries want to keep hunting and just stockpile it.

        IDIOTS.

        Since when has tradition become more important than extinction.

  4. I think my question is why did they deposit funds in an Icelandic bank. Obviously, an executive decision gone wrong. And, funds are being held and invested for what reason? To me, funds should be dispersed as they accumulate.
    I don’t care what region or country, all appropriations should be a matter of public knowledge when it is a charitable organization.

    • To me, funds should be dispersed as they accumulate.

      Excellent point Dee. As I was saying to Rudolph, it was a time of greed in the UK and the Icelandic banks were even more greedy in promising unrealistic returns on deposits which they could not sustain. As I recall local authorities in Britain lost one billion pounds doing the same thing, depositing in Icelandic banks. You can’t trust the Icelandics ;). They now over-fish and kill endangered wales as their main source of income.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>