By ‘thicker’ I mean more stupid. Here are two clear examples concerning one search term. The search term is: “In general, humans don’t like their anatomy. INFOGRAPHIC“. As I created the infographic, I know what it is about, which is the possible detrimental effect on health of disliking one’s anatomy.
Firstly, Google consistently tries to improve the spelling of the search term. But fails miserably by simply repeating what has been stated. It is pathetic and indicates that Google staff are not paying attention.
They are asleep which applies to their running of Google Blogspot (Blogger), their free blogging platform, which regularly develops faults. And Google Photos likewise. That has some inherent faults like the inability to change the cover image of a photo book. It is neglect basically. I have left Google Photos and gone to White Wall.
Secondly, Google search simply does not understand some search terms which is astonishing nowadays with AI everywhere on the internet.
To refer again to the search term above, Google search lists general articles about human anatomy which is off the mark by miles. Its top search result today is an article on human anatomy in the form of infographics published by Coventry City Council.
But no reference to a discussion about humans not liking their anatomy and the consequences of that which is what my infographic and article is all about. The title is clear as to what it is about but Google search ignores this. Google lists my article on page 3 where it is invisible.
Bing on the other hand lists my page on page one, second down, in at least recognising the uniqueness of the concept implicit in the title. And Bing does not try and rewrite the title in a stupid and inaccurate spell check.
Request to Google: for years you have been trying to rewrite search terms in an idiotic and inaccurate way. Please stop. And try and better understand the content of the article through its title. You can do better.
More: search engines
