Categories: buying cats

I thought I bought my cat but I am renting it

This is extraordinary. It is also a con and treating companion animals as cars or some other factory made ‘product’. It is about buying a pet on what in the UK we call “hire-purchase” – a form of leasing. It is the way you buy cars.

I had no idea that you could lease a cat or a dog. You can in America. I would have thought that this is an exception or very rare. I hope so. Nobody wishing to purchase a cat or dog would consider leasing him/her.

The only way you can get someone to sign a contract which leases a pet is to mislead the customers into believing that she had bought her cat or dog. Do you think someone would knowingly enter into a contract to rent a cat?

This is precisely what happened to Dawn Sabins in San Diego. After the family’s shiba inu (a breed of dog) died she wanted to adopt a new companion, a puppy, with her seven-year-old son in mind.

She found a pet store and ‘bought’ a golden retriever. She named him Tucker. She paid a lot: $2,400. But it was only the beginning of her payments unbeknownst to her.

A few weeks elapsed and she was going over her credit card statement. She noticed a whopping $5,800 charge from a company she had never heard of.

For some peculiar reason (and I am afraid Sabins is at least partly to blame here) she had been offered and accepted financing through a company called Wags Lending (I think she believed she was purchasing Tucker on credit) to rent. They had assigned the debt to Oceanside. In this convoluted transaction another firm, Monterey Financial Services, was also involved and from them she learned that she was renting Tucker and was not the owner.

Sabins asked Monterey Financial Services: ‘How in the heck can I owe $5,800 when I bought the dog for $2,400?’

Response: ‘You’re not financing the dog, you’re leasing.’

Sabins: ‘You mean to tell me I’m renting a dog?’

Response: ‘Yeah’.

She had agreed (but not agreed!) to pay 34 monthly payments of $156.06 to lease her dog. At the end of the payment she had the option to purchase Tucker by paying the equivalent of two months rent. The contract would have stated that missed payments would result in the dog being taken back. The cost works out as exceptionally high – the equivalent of more than 70% annualized interest (twice the usual credit card amount).

Sabins sold the dog for $500 to a dog trainer. This must have been after the end of the contract because she could not do that unless she had paid the last two payments to acquire title to the dog. That was one hell of a costly mistake.

A cat lover ‘bought’ a Bengal kitten from a Jacksonville, Florida breeder. The price: $1,700. That’s a lot already. She learned late in the day that she had contracted for 32 monthly payments of $129 or $4,100. She must have bought on credit but was unaware that she had signed up to a cat lease (not a cat leash!) and was unaware of the exorbitant interest rates.

The moral is simple: read the contract, no matter how boring it is, if you are purchasing a cat or dog on the never-never. Credit is okay but that is not leasing a cat. In a straight credit purchase the buyer owns the animal outright at the outset and in the UK, the consumer has added rights and protection. They can actually be reimbursed by the financing company if things go wrong.

America also has consumer protection legislation. It may well have applied in these cases, I don’t know. If a customer is mislead she/he may have the right to declare the contract void. Although, I won’t go into that sort of stuff here.

Note: a Bill is being discussed by the California legislature to ban the leasing of pets! Great.

Source: bloomberg.com



Please comment here using either Facebook or WordPress (when available).
Michael Broad

Hi, I'm a 71-year-old retired solicitor (attorney in the US). Before qualifying I worked in many jobs including professional photography. I have a girlfriend, Michelle. I love nature, cats and all animals. I am concerned about their welfare.

View Comments

  • https://www.consumeraffairs.com/finance/monterey-financial-services.html

    https://www.policygenius.com/blog/pet-store-dog-lease-scam/

    http://wagslending.com/

    This intrigued me because it makes no sense to lease a dog or cat. My thinking is the lease part is how they enforce the contract so that if someone defaults they can punish you and take the pet back. Most creditors don't want the merchandise back aside from cars and homes. BUT miss a payment from a furniture store like Rent-A-Center and they'll have the truck in your driveway.

    http://www.dogster.com/the-scoop/

    http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-19896-rent-a-pup.html

    Painting getting a pet like buying a sofa you don't like and then returning it.

      • The pet leasing companies seem to be up front online my guess is employees in pet stores may not be aware of the details of the financing. Most people who could afford to buy a 2500$ dog would not need subprime loan shark borderline usury lending. This makes it even more predatory. Several of these companies say they use rescued pets. So the pet you could get for 50 dollars at the shelter is now 100$+ a month for life with the idea that the company pays for vet bills and food. Their vet, their food. The use of backyard breeders/puppy mills to keep the shelves stocked with living creatures. This is being soft peddled as a way to own a pet with an all in one package.
        wonderful find on this one Michael everyone should be aware of this scam.

  • That's nuts.
    I've known quite a few people who part lease a horse but the contract is very well spelled out when you have use of the horse and your financial responsibility. Usually vets, farrier and other upkeep remains in the owners hands. You simply pay a monthly fee for use.
    Some rescues retain ownership so a dog/cat that ends up in a shelter can be claimed by them or they may be able to simply take the pet if there is neglect. A clever move to protect the investment many rescues put into individual animals. I've seen it with horse rescues as it keeps the horse from ending up in the slaughterhouse. You can't just sell them. They must go to an approved home.
    What you are describing is fraud. I am guessing that once attached to that pet most people will pay the contract to keep it and avoid trashing their credit. It's emotional blackmail.

  • This is fascinating -- Consumer Fraud Division of all state Attorney General's Offices should be alerted. Haven't encountered this practice but it's sad & puzzling because it shows that there is an actual market of people who want pets so much. Too bad rescuers can't tap into this hunger more successfully, though I think many have made great strides in marketing their adoptions. Of course the ethical standards of doing this are a whole other topic.

Recent Posts

Are ionizers safe for cats?

There is a questionmark over whether ionizers are safe for cats. Ionic air purifiers produce…

1 hour ago

Equity release to pay for a catio extension

Equity release is more popular nowadays because a lot of older people have most of…

7 hours ago

Ethical banks in the UK in 2020 and why cat lovers should use them!

How often do we think of alternatives to the high street banks? I don't or…

10 hours ago

“Care will kill a cat” – Ben Jonson

Ben Jonson is in the news today! On this day, 22nd September, in 1598, the…

11 hours ago

A reminder that cats reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease

Living with a cat companion when younger can protect against heart disease when older. I'm…

13 hours ago

YouTube film-makers are staging kitten rescues for money

YouTube film-makers are staging kitten rescues for money and pretending that the rescue is genuine.…

23 hours ago