Is It Legal to Trap to Kill Feral Cats in Wisconsin?

If a trapper in Wisconsin deliberately sets out to trap to kill feral cats then his actions would be illegal. The regulations regarding trapping animals in Wisconsin are quite extensive and quite complicated but they do list the animals that can be trapped, the sort of traps that can be used, the restrictions on certain locations and the dates during which trapping can take place.

Feral cat trapped and crushed
Feral cat trapped and crushed. This is not in Wisconsin.
Two useful tags. Click either to see the articles:- Toxic to cats | Dangers to cats

The animals that can be trapped are: beaver, fisher, bobcat, coyote, raccoon, red fox, grey fox, mink, muskrat and otter. Feral cats are not listed. Clearly if a trapper sets out to trap the above-mentioned wild animals then he may incidentally and inadvertently or perhaps carelessly trap a feral cat. This would be considered an “incidental take”.

It is not, as far as I can see, illegal to trap a feral cat if that cat is a genuine incidental take. That, in my opinion, is a sad state of affairs but it’s the way it is in Wisconsin.

But oviously a person engaging in trapping animals cannot intend to trap any animal. Otherwise it would be legal to trap a domestic cat or dog, for example. And it would be legal to put down a trap that could kill an animal on a sidewalk in a suburban area. That would be quite nonsensical.

Therefore, we are talking about the mental state, by which I mean the intentions, of the trapper. How do we find out which animals he intends to trap? The answer must be found by studying the area where he is doing his trapping. You can also find out the person’s intentions by what he says and what he does.

If a person sets out to trap feral cats then in my opinion his actions fall outside of the regulations regarding trapping and his actions then fall within the ambit of the Wisconsin Cruelty to Animals Statutes.

The Wisconsin Cruelty to Animals Statutes do not override the laws regarding the trapping of animals in Wisconsin. The laws are meant to run side-by-side with one not contravening the other.

The animal cruelty law in Wisconsin (Chapter 951) makes it clear that, “no person may treat any animal, whether belonging to the person or another, in a cruel manner”.

Therefore, I conclude, that if a person deliberately sets out to trap to kill feral cats he or she will be in breach of 951.02. Certain traps cause a massive amount of damage and pain.

Clearly the difficulty is in proving that the trapper deliberately wanted to kill feral cats by trapping them. That is called “mens rea” in criminal law legal parlance.

Mr Sam Wood admits that sometimes he has to kill feral cats in animal traps. This has been reported in the online newspaper ABC Wisconsin. Note the word “has to”. This implies that he is deliberately killing feral cats because they are invasive species and they kill native species and he is concerned, he says, with conservation.

Mr Sam Wood openly admits on Facebook that he detests feral cats and he wishes that he could kill them for their fur to make money. He refers to them as “evil bustards”.

I believe that you will find amongst all the videos and words on Mr Sam Wood’s Facebook page strong evidence that he deliberately kills feral cats either by trapping them or shooting them. This is illegal.

The problem is that the chief of police says that he has not done anything illegal because the feral cats caught in his traps are treated as incidental catches and part of his normal trapping activities. And the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources confirm that there are no laws regulating the trapping of feral cats (meaning they are not listed). Wisconsin seems to have an attitude towards animals which is not that conducive to animal welfare. The authorities don’t want to prosecute animal cruelty crimes. Perhaps this is why Sam Woods gets away with animal cruelty?

However, the key, as mentioned above, is that if we are to prove that Mr Wood is acting illegally we have to prove that the feral cats are not “incidental catches” but primary catches whereupon his actions fall under animal cruelty laws.

I should say that under Wisconsin’s invasive species laws (CH. NR 40), effective May 1, 2015, the feral cat is not listed as an invasive species and therefore cannot be killed in traps as an exception to the animal welfare acts of that state. I mention this because feral cat haters normally quote invasive species regulations which they argue gives them carte blanche to kill feral cats as they wish.

Further, it has to be mentioned that it is impossible to distinguish between a feral cat and a stray cat. Stray cats are often domestic and therefore owned by somebody. This is probably why the feral cat is not listed as an invasive species.

Therefore, if Mr Wood traps a domestic cat, the owner, if aware of it, could report the matter to law enforcement which should lead to a successful prosecution under animal welfare laws and under laws concerning criminal damage.

If anybody can add to this then please do so in a comment. I am open to amendment and correction in the interests of truth and accuracy. Cat haters and killers need not comment unless it is polite and the law is quoted verbatim.

13 thoughts on “Is It Legal to Trap to Kill Feral Cats in Wisconsin?”

  1. Hi, we have one of these idiots who is a feral hater and just today he killed one of our sweetest ferals. He uses live traps and then takes them to the woods and shoots them. We have called the sheriff and he always tell them that he relocated them. But we have gone to all our local shelters and no cats. Sheriff does nothing. There are several of us who take care of these ferals so they don’t bother the birds or other wildlife. If we can gain their trust, we will take them in to be fixed. I already myself adopted 2 of them. God, please tell me what we can do to save the rest of them before this idiot kills the rest of them. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

    Reply
    • Your predicament and the predicament of the feral cats you mention is I am afraid typical. There are quite a lot of people who like to kill feral cats in America and in other countries. I guess you are aware of this. Your comment indicates that the only way to stop this man is to gain more evidence that he is killing the feral cats. You say that he shoots the feral cats.

      Does he leave the bodies where he shoots them? Can you retrieve the bodies? If you can you will see bullet wounds. Is it possible to place camera traps in the woods which would record him shooting the cats?

      In order to be successful in this he will need to take the cats to the same place each time. You can then place a camera trap (a camera which is triggered by movement) on a tree, hidden from you, which might be able to record him doing this. These cameras are cheap on Amazon.

      In short, you need to use your imagination to gain evidence. The police will be disinterested in getting evidence themselves. The crime is too minor in their eyes. You might be able to get evidence from other people who also know that he is killing feral cats. They may have hard evidence themselves.

      You may be able to talk to the man. If you can you should record the conversation secretly. Use your smart phone to do this. You can put it on record and place the phone in your top pocket with the microphone pointing outwards. We then talk to the guy and ask questions in a tricky kind of way to tease out the truth from him.

      If he admits that he kills them and he might do because he might be annoyed by them you’ve got him. He might lose his temper and therefore his self-control, you can then go to the police with the recording. That would be some good evidence. Good luck. I know how terrible this is.

      Reply
  2. From the way Sam talks in his videos he sets out to trap feral cats. That it isn’t a trap set out to trap another animal and a feral accidentally wanders into it. His intent is to catch and kill ferals because he thinks they’re a danger to wildlife. The sheriff has already visited him, according to his posts, and say he isn’t breaking any laws.

    Reply
    • I agree with you about Sam’s intentions and the Sheriff is wrong! He just does not care enough to consider the law accurately in my view. I wish he’d come to the page and comment!

      Reply
      • The difficulty arises because the feral cats don’t belong to someone. Mr. Nutsack is telling people how to kill feral cats in fact bragging about it. There is no way to know if he is killing pet cats. And most important we have no reliable source for exactly what the sheriff told him. He’s walking a fine line and he’s going to kill the wrong cat or small dog with his crap traps.

        Reply
        • Yes, ME. These people do kill domestic cats sometimes. But the owner just thinks her/his cat has disappeared and law enforcement are disinterested.

          Reply
            • Here’s how much he’s on “law enforcements (sic) radar.”

              http://www.thenorthwestern.com/story/news/2017/02/17/sheriff-feral-cat-photo-came-new-zealand/98008104/

              “Officers also checked the Waushara County area and found no evidence of feral cats being killed anywhere, Nett said, noting Woods has not committed any crime.

              “I think it’s a classic case of the internet and everybody taking information and running with it,” Nett said.”

              You and all your friends (and now this site that you posted this on), on the other hand, are clearly on law-enforcement’s radar — a whole faction of people to never be taken seriously ever again. Your online petitions will be the source of a good laugh and more to file in the landfill.

              Reply
              • I don’t know what your comment is meant to achieve. It says nothing. It says nothing more than that which I have already mentioned in the article. We know that law enforcement are disinterested in enforcing the law against people like Mr Sam Wood who likes to trap cats with the intention of trapping them.

                My article was written from basic facts. Nothing was taken from the Internet by way of gossip other than what Mr Wood has stated on his Facebook page.

                As to being on law enforcement’s radar, I quite like that. And to say that were not taken seriously is ridiculous. If we were not taken seriously you wouldn’t have found the time to make a comment in a rather hollow and desperate attempt to undermine what we are stating.

                I see more and more desperation from people like yourself who support cruelty against animals including feral cats.

                Reply

Leave a Comment

follow it link and logo