Lawyer for Kristen Lindsey defends his client in letter to Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners

The attorney, Brian W. Bishop, is representing Kristen Lindsey in her defense against the investigation by the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners (TBVME) to sanction Dr Lindsey for her alleged killing of a domestic cat (claimed to be feral) with a bow and arrow at close range. Most of us have heard about this notorious case. If not, please click this.

Mr Bishop must also be representing and defending Kristen Lindsey generally. I believe Brian W Bishop has his own law firm in Austin Texas (900 West Avenue).

Update at 1st June 2015: his website is currently down probably as a consequence of acting for Kristen Lindsey. A visitor to PoC, kindly provided his details in a comment.

A colleague of mine has kindly sent me a copy of a leaked letter that Mr Bishop wrote to the TBVME. It is reproduced below and I have typed it out as the image is small and hard to read.

Letter from lawyer to Texas Board

Two useful tags. Click either to see the articles: Toxic to cats | Dangers to cats

Dear Ms Hudson,

This firm represents Dr. Lindsey DVM in the referenced complaint.

Dr. Lindsey denies that she engaged in any violation of Board Rule 573.4. Among other things, neither the act of posting of a photograph, nor this alleged act of killing of a ferel [sic] cat on Dr. Lindsey’s residential property were “connected to the practice of veterinary medicine’ or otherwise a criminal activity.

Please cease and desist from any further attempts to contact Dr. Lindsey or her family. Also as you are aware, TBVME complaints are confidential per Texas Occ. Code § 801.207 – the TBVME has, however, been discussing the complaint and related matters with third parties (including Dr. Ron Stried DVM) in flagrant disregard of Dr. Lindsey’s right to privacy and confidentiality – these disclosures must stop immediately.

Yours Very truly

Brian W. Bishop

My comment (please add your below): firstly I apologise for adding to Dr Lindsey’s lack of privacy in this matter but feel it needs to be aired due to public interest.

The key statement, I believe, is that the lawyer claims that Lindsey’s alleged killing of Tiger, the ginger tabby, is unconnected with the practice of veterinary medicine.

I strongly disagree with this. It has to be closely connected to the work of a vet because the attitude and behavior of a vet outside of her/his workplace is critical to (a) the standing of the veterinary profession generally in the USA and further afield and (b) the way a vet conducts herself at her workplace.

The work of even the most highly skilled veterinarian will be compromised if the vet in question has a poor attitude towards animal welfare. Compassion is a key characteristic of the good veterinarian. You could argue that it is essential.

Judging by the behavior of Dr Lindsey she has a poor and unsuitable attitude towards the welfare of animals. There was not an ounce of compassion in her alleged close range shooting of her neighbor’s cat.

Whether what she allegedly did is criminal or not is down to a court to decide. However, the broad opinion on the internet, where this notorious example of cat cruelty has been widely discussed, is that she committed a crime and should be punished accordingly.

I am surprised that Mr Bishop is demanding that the TBVME should stop contacting people other than Lindsey because how else can they investigate the matter?

Please search using the search box at the top of the site. You are bound to find what you are looking for.

Useful tag. Click to see the articles: Cat behavior

152 thoughts on “Lawyer for Kristen Lindsey defends his client in letter to Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners”

  1. I have written to Koehn but have received no response. This person who, in my opinion imitates a vet, has very serious issues with judgement in addition to ethics and morals. She callously killed a cat who was not feral (feral or not makes no difference other than lindsey may have been trying to cause anguish to her neighbor), a cat who may have been caught in a trap prior to being killed. She hoisted this poor animal, who may have been alive at the time, like a trophy,posing so her mother could take the pic (so her mother claims on fb). She bragged on her cruelty. Now she is going to say that this poor cat was endangering her or hers, and I ask, by what means? Meowing? If this is what she does in public, who is to say what goes on behind the supposed vet’s door during medical procedures. What if she doesn’t like your pet? What if you rescue a feral for medical care? How many pets left that office actually receiving proper medical care? A thorough investigation is in order here, an actual audit of every case where of every facility in which she was associated.

  2. She’s not good enough to be a Vet ..Her post I saw the same day she shoot that cat in the head with a arrow and bragged about it …sick girl

  3. Didn’t I read that killing a cat, feral or otherwise, was against the law in texas? Wouldn’t that be the connection between killing tiger and ‘criminal activity’ he is stating doesn’t exist?

  4. Using the logic that she should keep her veterinary license because this happened outside of work, then should a policeman be able to keep his job if he commits a crime while he’s off duty?
    Whether you take an oath to protect and serve animals or people, you’re held to a certain standard of conduct that must be held at ALL times

  5. This comment came from the D.A.’ office earlier today;

    “(AUSTIN COUNTY) — The case against a Washington County veterinarian who killed a cat with a bow and arrow and posted the photo to Facebook will not be presented to an Austin County Grand Jury today.

    The Austin County District Attorney’s office says they are actively pursuing statements, records and all other available evidence and information pertaining to the case before they present to the Grand Jury.

    Veterinarian Kristen Lindsey was fired from the Washington Animal Hospital after the photo went viral.

    If convicted of animal cruelty in Texas, Lindsey could get up to a year in jail and a $4,000 fine.”

    1. Thanks Michele but I don’t understand why there is a Grand Jury today when the prosecution have not got together all the evidence. How can the Grand Jury come to a proper decision?

      1. Sorry Michael, I have no idea how the court system works in the USA, but I’m sure one of our American friends will be able to explain to us Brits.

        Having read that review on Yelp earlier today, I’m now concerned as to whether the D.A. will actually prosecute Lindsey. They allege he has a history of fobbing-off animal abuse cases.

        1. Michael, think I’ve just twigged. The Grand Jury is similar to the Crown Prosecution Service. The police case and evidence have to be presented to them before they can formally file charges against the accused.

          In the UK the C.P.S. decide whether public prosecutions should proceed or not and this is probably based on the likelihood of a successful conviction. Let’s hope the sheriff’s office did a thorough job of collecting evidence and that there’s at least one cat owner on the Grand Jury.

  6. It would seem that Washington Animal Clinic are still in business and on a goodwill mission to restore their reputation. They’ve just donated $2,000 in equipment to Blinn Veterinary Technology.

    Blood money is not going to erase the public’s memory.

  7. One more thing: I have a friend that is associated with a different animal clinic in Brenham & last week he told me she is being investigated. He also said that even if she is not stripped of her license she’s dead in the water as a vet anyway. He said when a vet is hired the person doing the hiring always does a google search & that’s the first thing that comes up with her name. Who’s going to want that on their staff? I feel pretty confident she’s done with this career.

      1. Ms Lindsey’s infamy as a cat killer may already have cost the Washington Animal Clinic their reputation and business. Their own web site has been closed for several weeks now, but I don’t know if they are still actually trading.

        I came across a very interesting comment on Yelp reviews, alleging that Ms. Lindsey was living or visiting with Dr. Buenger (her boss) when all of this took place. If this is true, it means that despite publicly claiming otherwise, he knew all about Ms. Lindsey’s killing of Tiger before it even went public. You can read the rest of the review here …

          1. I’m not surprised.

            Some shocking allegations were made in the comments, which could be considered libellous if untrue. On the other hand, if they were speaking the truth, then Ms Lindsey is even nastier than we already think she is.

  8. It’s no secret that an attorney’s job when defending his client is to throw all sorts of things out there to see what sticks. It isn’t unusual for one to overstep & see if any traction comes out of it. He is no legal right to order anyone to do anything at this point; he can only strongly suggest. Anyway, let’s hope his office is so flooded with emails about his decision making process that he dumps her. One can hope!

      1. I’ve just sent a polite, e-mail to the D.A. and his Assistants urging them to prosecute Ms Lindsey to the fullest extent of the law.

        I’ve also asked if updates will be made available to the public and where we might access such information.

  9. Hello Michele, Thanks so much for responding and if you know anyone else who would like to write and /or email Mr.Koehn, would really appreciate you passing the info along. Here is his contact info:Mr. Travis Koehn
    Austin County District Attorney
    One E. Main
    Bellville, Texas 77418
    email: da******@in**********.com You are right about all you say here. She really is a sociopath and does not seem to grasp that there is no difference in a feral animal or a domesticated one except one got lucky and the other poor creature did not ~ They are ALL sentient beings. Besides she really did not even know whether the cat belonged to anyone anyway to begin with. However nothing justifies her cruel and savage behavior. She pledged to care for animals in the most humane way possible by becoming a vet. and she certainly acted far from their principles, whether she was ‘at work’ or in her off hours it amounts to the same thing. Thanks for caring!

    1. A sociopath with access to some serious weapons! I mentioned that in my e-mail to the D.A.’s office.

      Now that her face is well known she’ll have a tough time finding work as a vet. How could anyone, especially cat owners, ever trust her to do the right thing for their pet, when we’ve seen what callous regard she has for cats. I imagine that anyone whose cat died whilst under her professional care, will now be second guessing whether she actually did all she could to help them.

      1. Yes! We can only hope that at the very least she will no longer be allowed to practice and that her record will be there for anyone in future , should she attempt to get a job elsewhere. Thanks so much for writing and just read a little while ago via another source, that the District Att. is very much aware of this case and although they cannot comment apparently it is supposedly being looked at to go to court. I just want her also to be made aware of how serious her action was and how many people have a real problem with this strange disconnect she is apparently able to incorporate with ease into the way she acts and thinks!

        1. She will be forever linked with killing Tiger.

          Whenever I post on F.B. or write to the authorities I make a point of saying how many of us here in the UK are closely following this case. Like many others worldwide, we’re horrified that a vet of all people could commit such a horrendous act of animal cruelty and then brag about it afterwards.

          1. Thank you so much Michele, I am really gratified to know this outpouring of concern and caring is not just confined to the state where it happened or even the U.S but one of the best things about the internet is that this kind of information can reach people all over the planet. I have very close associations with the UK and lived as a child in England ~ it has always felt like my spiritual home so it it lovely to have made contact with a fellow animal rights activist as well as everyone here who cares about defending the voiceless ~ Great that Michael is doing this wonderful work too on behalf of cats. Cheers.

  10. In case anyone is interested this is where the situation stands at present~ if you feel you would like to help move this in the right direction it would not be a bad idea to let the Austin District Attorney know your views (politely) Thanks. On Tuesday, Austin County Sheriff Jack Brandes announced that their investigation had ended and the results have been turned over to District Attorney Travis Koehn. Brandes made clear that he is recommending animal cruelty charges for Lindsey.

    “At 7:59 this morning, the Austin County Sheriff has completed the investigation of the Animal Cruelty case first reported to us last Friday,” the Austin County Sheriff said in a statement on Facebook. “The completed case file has been turned over to the Austin County District Attorney for filing of charges under Texas Penal Code 42.092. With the completion of the investigation, the Sheriff’s Office will not release any further comments or updates to this case. Any comments, questions or information requests must be made directly to the District Attorney’s Office.”

    1. Val, thank you for this latest update. Do you have an e-mail address for D.A. Koehn as I would like to write to him regarding this case.

      Like others here, I’m following this case closely because I want to see justice for Tiger and make sure Ms Lindsey is never allowed to work with animals again.

      She really is a piece of scum, gloating about killing for fun. She’s an insult to the thousands of genuinely caring vets who are obliged to euthanise healthy animals every day simply because there aren’t enough homes available for them.

      1. Michele, if you have any information on Lindsey’s prosecution (if it takes place) please leave a comment asap so I can turn into a post. People are interested in this. Thanks.

  11. I find this statement issued by the attorney so ludicrous, that if it did not concern so serious a matter I would laugh at the sheer audacity and absurdity of it. By taking the life of ANY animal , especially in the savage manner she did , then find it not only acceptable, but something to be proud of by displaying a photo of her ‘kill’ has EVERYTHING to do with her fitness and ability to practice veterinary medicine. At the very least one has to call her mental fitness into question. As a pet owner and animal lover and activist , I cannot begin to imagine trusting her judgement on anything related to animals. I think she has serious issues emotionally.This woman needs to prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. We as a civilized society and the only voice for animals MUST ensure they are protected and have rights under the law . Don’t be intimidated by this lawyer-speak~ seems to me he is grasping at straws here and I understood the Sheriffs office is looking to take her to court over this from a recent article I read via facebook. No one who can call themselves humane and a carer of animals could so callously and quite proudly boast of her kill. A feral cat is no different than a house cat except they have not had the good fortune to have been found or cared for by a human or if being fed by someone they cannot be taken in for some reason~ they are still sentient beings like all animals.

    1. Thanks for commenting Val. You are correct. He is grasping at straws. It is just bluff really. He is paid to do it. I still don’t have much hope that Lindsey will be successfully prosecuted despite her admission on Twitter.

      1. Am trying to see if emailing the sheriff’s dept there can provide any real concrete answers as to the likelihood for her prosecution. Thanks for responding to my comment and more especially for printing this article . If only there was a broader venue in which to reach more people who might be more vocal and to the direct authorities concerned.

  12. She is a disgusting excuse for a human being – The first psychopathic vet I have ever heard of.

    1. I wonder, though, if there are more like her but with their true feeling hidden away? I’d bet that there are. She was just arrogant and foolish enough to tell the world that she was unsuited to be a vet.

    2. Unfortunately there are others ~ but none that I know of who have made it as public as she did. Anyone who thinks they have encountered a vet who does have problems liking or treating any animal should report them ~ they have no business treating any animals

  13. I am upset by their attempt to separate her callous act of murdering a docile pet and medically treating pets in her veterinary practice. What split personality? How can she show kind, gentle compassion and then hunt, kill and gloat? She can’t! Lindsey has made the first legal move. I have mentioned this before but why can’t Tiger’s family file suit against her. I’m sure, if needed, some animal rights groups could help financially. Experts could be called in to testify the photo was Tiger. Any legal expenses could be recovered from Lindsey in what should be a slam dunk judgement.There is a photo, at least two eye witnesses (although her parents will be hostile), verbal admission and several other witnesses after the fact. A civil trial and judgement could help push the DA into filing criminal charges. This has went on far too long and by the act of Lindsey hiring an attorney and the tone of his letter you can see she has no remorse and no intent to admit or try to right her wrong. #justiceforTiger

    1. Agreed completely. Lindsey will fight for this to go away and it probably will and one day she’ll be practicing veterinary medicine somewhere perhaps under a pseudonym. That is how the world works usually. Sometimes I hate it.

      1. Well… her face is all over the internet, and not for a good reason.
        Google returns 5,960,000 results about her.

        I think that her life as she knew it is over.
        Good riddance.

        1. Yes, it is almost irrelevant what the authorities do because the internet and public opinion will be a form of punishment. That said there are a lot of people who want to see her convicted and sentenced on principle.

          1. Agreed,
            I also want to see her before a court of justice, my point was that she has been branded with a red iron for the rest of life, not for 6 months with probation in 5 months.

  14. Ms. Lindsey lost her rights for privacy and respect the minute she posted that God awful picture of herself holding a dying Tiger dangling on the end of well aimed arrow. Kristen Lindsey too a vow to protect, serve and save animals. NO doctor, nurse or any other medical professional I know goes “Off the clock”, on the contrary, they are ‘on’ for the rest of their lives. I know several people in the Veterinary world and they would NEVER pass up a chance to help an animal in need. Taking out their archery sets and blasting arrows through their heads then posting the picture with an arrogant comment is the last thing on their list of things to do. Let’s NOT forget her comment in the picture, “The only good feral Tom cat is a dead one”. Followed by, “Aren’t you worried about getting fired?” to which she replied. ‘Like they would get rid of me, I am so awesome!”…SHE SAID THAT KNOWING FULL WELL WHAT POSTING THAT PICTURE WAS GOING TO DO…she was advertising herself to the world as a real “Bad ass” and it turned around and bit her so badly she is running for cover, hired this pompous attorney to give us a ‘cease and desist” order…which only a JUDGE can issue..Kristen is trying to pull out some serious damage control and unfortunately for her, and fortunately for us…it isn’t going to work. I will not rest on this…I will continue to file complaint after complaint, letter after letter, email after email until this woman receives the punishment she so richly deserved.

    1. As far as feral cats go, I have had a colony for over 10 years now. I feed all year long. They are all TNR. I have several areas that have heat lamps inside of shelters. I have lost a couple do to old age, which were buried on my property. In summer time i get a lot of enjoyment from them. Some trust me so much that they come onto my deck and sit with me while I pass out treats. This so called vet, should have lost her job and she should be charged. That was animal cruelty at best.

    2. I agree completely with Susan. Isn’t Ms Lindsey showing her guilt when someone asks her if she is worried about being fired & she responded that won’t happen, shes too awesome. How can she stand there and have the dead cat in front of her & claim she didn’t do it then claim she wouldn’t be fired because she’s awesome!


  15. Off topic for a wee bit,keep a look out for one “Courtney Robertson”,unbeknownest to me until last night this woman Courtney started a page (Friends Of Tiger)to garner monetary donations and when investigated by my admins on my Tiger page of 1 who is an actual 501c3 she started attacking my admins because she refused to post her nonprofit status and because of this fiasco she almost ruined my gofundme cause to get Tigers portrait painted,she blasted my name on her instagram page spewing false allegations,this woman is off the rails and I sent her a scathing facebook PM blasting her then she turns around and post my message on her instagram page and edited out alot of wot I said to her,even made a claim I was the one painting Tigers portrait and profiting from his death but here is the kicker,she now is saying she has Kristen Lindsey’s personal celly # and they have been talking,like I said this twit is off the rails!

  16. Deborah Dzierwa

    As a feral caretaker as well as my support for the SPCA TNR program,I was greatly horrified of Ms Lindsey”s actions.Her rights went out the door when she posted that disturbing picture on the internet and bragged about it.She is a Vet,a doctor who took an oath to protect,heal,love animals.She has no right to be in the position of a caring animal doctor.She has sent the world a clear message of who she really is.I Know the Texas Board of Vets have high standards who they license,I hope they send a message of their own to protect their commitment of excellence for this wonderful profession!As a Rn,I take my oath serious,you protect it,you nurture it,you love it but most of all YOU LIVE UP TO IT!

  17. The whole tone of the letter is extremely arrogant. It more or less says Lyndsey doesn’t think she did anything wrong and doesn’t have to answer to anyone, so leave her alone or else! The lawyer or his secretary can’t spell feral either.

    I see she’s still trying to legitimise what she did by referring to Tiger as feral. She’s a pretty crappy vet if she can’t distinguish between a feral and a well cared for pet cat at close range.

    Whether any formal action is taken against her or not, her name will forever be associated with killing a pet cat.

    1. The problem is that if her license is not revoked, she can legally move to another part of the state, change her name, and start practicing again, or just move to another state and apply for a new license in another state with a new name! If her license is revoked in TX, she would have to report it before applying in another state! This needs to be reviewed by the board and they have procedures for doing an investigation that cannot be interfered with by any attorney! She had to agree to the terms in order to get her license in the first place! This case needs to be prosecuted to send a message to her and all animal abusers that not only the public, but the courts will not tolerate the senseless and cruelty of killing innocent animals without just cause! Simply saying that feral cats are open game is not a defense because even feral cats feel pain and are only trying to survive because of someone else’s cruelty and abandonment! They are no different from someone’s pet and in this case was someone’s pet, mistakenly presumed to be feral by an unprofessional, heartless vet! She deemed herself judge and jury for Tiger, and she found him to worthy of a death sentence…which was wrong on her part! She used poor judgement in killing the cat and posting it on the Internet and doesn’t deserve to practice veterinary medicine anywhere…in fact, she should be prohibited from ever owning a pet of her own!!!

      1. Thanks Linda for commenting. You make a good point about changing name and state. She might get away with it.

  18. when this letter is sent out to everyone how complained, you have 10 days to respond. Lindsey will be given the responses and have one final opportunity for rebuttal. The public does not get to see that final response.
    The board review will be interesting, this case can either go to the Medical Review (medical judgment or practice) or Staff Committee Review (administrative issues). Personally I am hoping for Staff Committee.The medical review is done only by two veterinarian and historical results are not consistent leading me to believe decisions are not base solely on objective evidence. The Staff committee involve not only board vets, but the executive director, director of enforcement, member of board staff assigned to investigate the complaint, and general counsel (lawyers)I think there is a better chance for success in a forum not only composed of veterinarian

  19. Sandra Murphey, No. CA, USA

    Wouldn’t it be great if this actually results in a loss of business for the attorney, and for the inhumane vet?
    That may be all the justice we see, but I do hope she loses her license, in addition to losing business. Who would take their animal to her after this? People who aren’t online, or aware of what’s happened, or those who think she was right? Maybe those who have pets, and also shoot other domestic animals?

    1. It might not surprise you, Sandy, but she does have some supporters. Quite a few in fact. Someone started a fundraising campaign for her!

      I suppose there are a lot of people who (a) hate cats (b) love hunting (c) like killing cats.

  20. As for her privacy, she threw that out the door when she posted the merciless photo of her cruelty to animals. She brought this on herself, and will now pay the price for her evil narcissist self promotion. I would say that she ultimately has lost her career because of her barbarian behavior, and thank God for that for the animals. In this matter I would say that public opinion rules, and she loses.

    1. Well said. Absolutely, she throw away her right to privacy because she was pleased to publicise to the widest possible audience her enjoyment in killing a cat. Thanks for commenting Carol.

    2. This psycho-vet lost any privacy rights when she posted a photo and bragged about it. She opened the door wide to all the well-deserved outrage coming her way.

  21. Well, naturally ol’ Bri is going to defend the skank. He’s getting paid for it. That bit about the cease and desist order is a scare tactic. I don’t know much about law, but even I know that only a judge can issue such an order. That just tells me that Lindsey has retained a scumbag just like her. Good luck with this case, Brian. Try something else.

    1. Anyone can write a cease and desist letter, no judge is required, no lawyer is required technically but having one write it is advised…

  22. I sent him a scathing email and telling him that his threat of cease and desist does NOT scare me and also that letter is not legal since only a Judge can order a cease and desist letter,I told him we will NOT go away and that Tigers supporters will be there for his parents until there is a conviction!

      1. Judith Pannebaker

        Additionally, if you’ll notice, the so-call “cease and desist” order was NOT written on law firm letterhead. What attorney sends an official missive without doing so on his firm’s letterhead? Most peculiar.

        1. Thanks for that observation Judith. You could be right. It may not have the letterhead because it has been trimmed off when published on the internet but I don’t know.

          1. Casey Gilbreath

            It is driving me crazy….WHY are people referring to this “pet cat” as a “feral cat”?? He is obviously the neighbors pet cat…..NOT a feral cat just living in the streets and alleyways. My ex-husband is a veterinarian and they too, as well as human doctors, take an oath to protect and do their very best to heal these precious animals that depend on them. This so called veterinarian needs to have her license pulled and to be band from EVER practicing veterinarian medicine ever again, that is AFTER she gets out of prison….this to me is a felon, and should she be charged with a felon it is an automatic loss of her license. Praying for the family of this precious cat and for all of the other animals she more than likely HAS abused in her practice. I am retired from Family & Children Services and it is a known fact that someone who abuses animals will more than likely abuse children and the elderly. She has GOT to be stopped before she has anymore opportunities!!!! We must all stick together, maybe even sending petitions to the Veterinarian Board there in Texas and to Colorado State Veterinary School where she received her degree, to have her records permanently closed and pulled, if possible.

            1. It seems that some people wish to defend her by saying that the cat was a feral cat. In addition, initially, there was some talk of the cat being a feral cat. Now, it is pretty much common knowledge that the cat was a domestic cat belonging to an neighbour. It is rather strange that we don’t know anything about the neighbor and neither have we heard from them in any way at all.

              Thanks for commenting. Your sentiments are shared by more than 90% of the people.

            2. I’ve been saying the same thing! She took an oath that’s no different than a human physician/doctor taking the same oath except for where’s the difference & further more what’s even scarier are all these people along with Kristen who think there’s nothing wrong with this infamous act!

      2. Mr. Broad, I must do this or I will scream. I’m sorry, I’m a grammar nazi and I can’t help it. Please check your spelling..*defense* not defence. Great write up, by the way.

        1. Hello Remona. In the UK people spell defence as I have spelt it! In America they use an ‘s’. You don’t know this but I live in London, UK and therefore I spell it with a ‘c’ but sometimes I make sure it is spelt in the American way. I usually use American spelling by the way. Sometimes I mix the two because this site is international, getting visitors across the world but most visitors come from America. I’ll amend it right now just you!

          Thanks are visiting and commenting.

    1. Do you read this the same as me. Is this attorney actually telling the board to cease and desist from contacting Lindsey? Are you kidding me?!?

        1. While I am not defending this horrible woman or her attorney, I did want to say that he can tell them to quit contacting Lindsey. Since she had an attorney, they can request that all contact be made through her legal counsel.

          1. Yes, good point, Kat. I had assumed that they would contact her lawyer but perhaps the board didn’t know she was represented at the time they contacted her. He also demands that they cease to contact her family. It would surprsing if he represented her family. In fact he probably can’t for reasons of potential conflict of interest.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

follow it link and logo

Note: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified.

I welcome and value comments. Please share your thoughts. All comments are currently unmoderated.

This blog is seen in 199 of the world's country's according to Google Analytics which is pretty much the entire world.

Scroll to Top