Microchip Would Have Saved This Elderly Cat Put down by Veterinarians Incorrectly

This is a UK story. The story concerns a tabby cat who was nearly 20 years of age. He went wandering outside which is typical in the UK. Some students picked him up, they fed him and say that he looked well. They handed the old boy to a local veterinarian in New Dover Road, Canterbury.

Emma's daughter Isabella with Tom the elderly cat put down unnecessarily
Two useful tags. Click either to see the articles: Toxic to cats | Dangers to cats

Emma’s daughter Isabella with Tom the elderly cat put down unnecessarily

There, a veterinarian working for an emergency animal specialist company called Vets Now, put down (euthanised or better still in this instance, killed) the old cat.

They justified the killing by saying that he was not microchipped and looked in a poor way. They say he drank a lot of water (hint at kidney disease) and ate very little. They say that his breathing deteriorated the day after he was placed at the veterinarian’s clinic. And they say that he appeared to be distressed. They assessed him as “benefiting from euthanasia”.

However, the cat’s owner said that he was not in poor condition. They say he looked old and therefore was a bit thin but there was no need to euthanise him. His owner says that they do not accept he had a breathing problem or loss of appetite. They’re surprised that all these problems developed over a matter of days after he went wandering.

As mentioned above, the students confirmed that he had a good appetite and was fine. The only reason they took him to the vet was because they did not know what else to do.

The reason in my view why the cat, whose name was Tom, was euthanised is because:

  1. He was not microchipped. That alone would have saved his life.
  2. He was old and therefore was thin. This is typical of elderly cats. It does not mean that they are ill or ready for euthanasia. But old cats look unhealthy sometimes for various reasons, one of which is thinness and a poor coat.
  3. He went wandering which is typical in the UK. This can be dangerous.
  4. The veterinarian made a bad, hasty decision. He should have waited for things to develop. Sometimes developments take place which clear up the matter allowing the owners to be reunited with their cat. Owners often telephone local vets in searching for their cat.

Tom’s owner Ms Emma Rush said that when they went to pick him up, they were told he had been euthanised. She found her cat in the freezer, curled up. A combination of events caused his unnecessary death.

Source: kentonline.co.uk

Useful tag. Click to see the articles: Cat behavior

Note: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified.
Useful links
Anxiety - reduce it
FULL Maine Coon guide - lots of pages
Children and cats - important

Michael Broad

Hi, I'm a 74-year-old retired solicitor (attorney in the US). Before qualifying I worked in many jobs including professional photography. I love nature, cats and all animals. I am concerned about their welfare. If you want to read more click here.

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. M E King says:

    It’s also a good time to remind everyone to make sure their contact information is current.

  2. ed says:

    thats so sad. its too bad he didnt have a collar either. i have issues with ANY “wandering animal”, but in CA they give u a collar that has a tag with ur phone number stamped on it, they chip ur animal too, & give u the code, etc “just in case”, but they tell u to keep ur animal indoors or penned(they actually wouldnt let someone adopt a pet cuz they were gonna let it “roam”). theyre pretty thorough. they also have an good catch & release program where they keep it & try to find it a home. its more like catch & adopt, which i think is waaayyy better than just releasing it so it can get hit, poisoned , trapped, or killed some time in the future. again, thats just me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *