I am shocked to learn that in many areas of the Netherlands hunting of stray cats is permitted. As “stray cats” are often simply domestic cats wandering around outside their home, this pastime, fully authorised by government, results in domestic cats being shot dead in their thousands.
It is certain that lots of “owned” cats are bound to be hunted. It is impossible to distinguish between a stray cat and a domestic cat. Stray cats are often domestic cats in the process of becoming feral.
The places in the Netherlands where hunting of cats is allowed are:
- Noord-Brabant
- Friesland
- Flevoland (update: believe now to have banned hunting of stray cats – Nov 2013)
- Utrecht
- Zuid-Holland
- Southern Limburg
- Texel
This is probably a complete list.
An estimated 8,000 to 13,000 cats are shot annually. It appears to be accepted by the citizens of these provinces and has been for years. What is going on? A country, especially a Northern European country, cannot condone and legalise the casual shooting of someone’s domestic cat. It is bound to lead to cat cruelty, pain, suffering and in England it would be crime punishable by a maximum 51 week jail term and/or £20,000 fine on conviction.
Even if a shot cat is genuinely feral and has no owner it is still animal cruelty because the only guaranteed way to kill a cat without pain is by a vet using approved drugs to euthanise the cat. Currently, the best way to deal with feral cats is TNR, a solution does not require brutal shooting.
My conclusion is that the Dutch government authorises animal cruelty. The desire amongst Dutch cat lovers is that the national government bans the hunting of stray cats. At present, each province of the Netherlands make their own law on this. Recently one of the provinces, Flevoland, banned it. On the other hand, the local government of Utrecht think it is perfectly acceptable, which surprises me.
The underlying reason why some provincial governments of the Netherlands allow people to shoot cats that happen to be out the home is because of the age old problem: too many cats without owners wandering around causing what some people consider to be a “feral cat problem”.
Clearly some local politicians find it acceptable to keep stray cat numbers down by allowing citizens to shoot them. This is neither humane nor decent behavior.
You can bet that no one in government has done anything about promoting better cat caretaking as a long term solution in conjunction with encouraging trap-neuter-return programmes. A decision to allow cat hunting is short-sighted and reactionary. Decent people are demanding long-term, humane and proactive steps instead. There are two petitions. This is one of them.
Looking at wider issues, there is no doubt that there is a need to unify animal welfare law across the European Union. At one time, in 2008, EU officials had firm plans to specify the size, shape and texture of fruit and vegetables across the EU. These officials were more concerned with the shape of a cucumber than whether the animal welfare laws were up to scratch in new member states and matched the best animal welfare laws amongst long standing members.
You do realise that over here it’s legal for gamekeepers and farmers to shoot stray cats on private land? Stray and feral cats are still classified as vermin that can be shot on private land, just the same as rabbits and pheasants can be shot. Some farmers call in rabbit/fox shooters to shoot “nuisance ferals”. The criteria is not to cause unnecessary suffering.
Exchange hosts in rural Brittany told me it was acceptable for hunters to shoot stray cats there as well (and for landowners to poison straying cats).
Sarah, could you tell were the shooting of strays by farmers on private land is an exception to the Animal Welfare Act 2006? I can’t find it. Is the exception that the farmer can shoot strays on the basis that the cat is deemed “wild” and not domesticated?
Stray/feral cats are non-domestic. Ferals are considered “pest” animals, especially if the farmer breeds gamebirds. Ferals also fall under the remit of pest control firms. Several of my rabbit-shooting & fox-shooting contacts have been asked to shoot feral cats at the same time (supposedly avoiding shooting any cat that is wearing a collar, though I’ve heard of cases where these are shot anyway and the collar is conveniently “lost”).
It’s the same with rabbits; pet rabbits are property, but wild rabbits are fair game.
Thanks Sarah. But are these farmers acting within the law? Or they just getting away with it. I ask because on private land it is easy to kill a cat with a gun with complete impunity. No chance of being caught. However, even if it was legal it seems to be a careless way to treat outdoor cats. How do you tell the difference between a stray, feral or wandering domestic cat from 50 yards while you are shooting him/her? Collars can’t be seen at 50 yards and in any case most cats don’t have collars. I think this an illegal activity.
What they are doing is legal. Once a (potentially) feral cat hops over a fence onto the farmer’s land, he is within his rights to shoot it. This came up a few years ago after one of the Mammal Society Surveys and cat control was discussed on Radio 4, including interviews with landowners and (anti-cat) naturalists over the legality. Plus an item about an owner who claimed her cat had been shot while sitting on the fence between her land and the farmer’s land.
It may seem distasteful, but feral cats are considered pests.
Sarah, do you want an avatar to go with your comments and articles? If you do, have a look at this page: https://pictures-of-cats.org/Avatars-for-PoC-Visitors.html
Can’t be bothered, lol.
LOL. I understand that completely.