California has its claws out as lawmakers push to ban cat declawing statewide.
California is taking a significant step toward banning the controversial practice of cat declawing, positioning itself to become the third U.S. state to outlaw the procedure. The proposed legislation, currently under review in the California State Assembly, aims to prohibit elective declawing of domestic cats, citing the practice as inhumane and unnecessary.
Declawing, also known as onychectomy, is the surgical removal of a cat’s claws by amputating the last bone of each toe. While often done to prevent scratching damage to furniture or humans, veterinary experts and animal welfare advocates argue that it causes lasting pain, behavioral issues, and long-term physical consequences for cats.
Cat declawing is inherently cruel and dramatically breaches the caregiver-to-cat unwriten contract. The operation was dreamed up on the back of the misguided concept of ‘man’s’ dominance over animals. – Michael
The bill, AB 2425, introduced by Assemblymember Wendy Carrillo (D-Los Angeles), would allow declawing only when medically necessary for the animal’s health, such as in cases of tumors, infections, or injuries affecting the claws. Performing the surgery for aesthetic or convenience reasons would be prohibited, with violators facing fines and potential disciplinary action from the California Veterinary Medical Board.
“Declawing is a cruel and outdated practice that causes irreversible harm to cats,” Carrillo said. “We must recognize that there are humane alternatives that don’t require surgically altering a cat’s natural behavior.”
Animal rights groups, including the Humane Society of the United States and PETA, have voiced strong support for the bill. They point to studies showing that declawed cats are more likely to experience chronic pain, develop litter box avoidance, or show increased aggression due to discomfort.
Veterinary associations are divided on the issue. While the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) discourages declawing and promotes education about alternatives like scratching posts and nail caps, it stops short of calling for a ban. Some veterinarians argue that a ban could limit their ability to serve clients who feel they have no other option—particularly for immunocompromised individuals or families with very young children.
California cities including Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Berkeley have already banned declawing locally. New York became the first state to enact a statewide ban in 2019, followed by Maryland in 2022.
If passed, California’s bill would strengthen the nationwide momentum toward protecting feline welfare and changing public attitudes about declawing. It reflects a growing recognition that scratching is a natural behavior for cats—not a nuisance to be eliminated, but an instinct to be accommodated.
The legislation is expected to face a vote later this year. In the meantime, veterinarians, cat owners, and lawmakers are engaging in spirited debate about animal ethics, personal responsibility, and the future of feline care in the state.
For California’s more than 12 million cat owners, the outcome of this bill could signal a major shift in how society respects the rights and needs of its smallest companions.
More: ban declawing
Why Cat Declawing Is Inherently Cruel and Violates the Caregiver-to-Cat Contract
Declawing a cat is far more than a simple nail trim—it is a surgical amputation of the last bone in each toe, the equivalent of removing a human’s fingers at the last knuckle. This procedure, often performed for owner convenience, leaves the cat with permanent physical and psychological consequences. Declawed cats frequently suffer chronic pain, altered gait, and behavioral problems, including aggression and litter box avoidance. These are not side effects—they are evidence of profound trauma.
At its core, declawing violates the implicit contract between caregiver and cat. When we bring a cat into our home, we assume responsibility for its well-being, safety, and dignity. In return, the cat offers companionship, trust, and affection—on its own feline terms. Declawing betrays that trust. It takes a natural, instinctive behavior—scratching—and punishes the animal for expressing it. Scratching isn’t misbehavior; it’s how cats stretch, communicate, and maintain healthy claws.
To surgically remove part of a cat’s body to make them more “manageable” reflects a misguided attempt to mold a creature into human convenience. True caregiving requires accommodation, patience, and respect for an animal’s nature. Providing scratching posts, training, and alternatives like nail caps are all ways we honor that relationship. Mutilating a cat to fit into a lifestyle or a pristine interior decor is not.
The decision to declaw is not one of necessity—it is one of priorities. And choosing furniture over the physical integrity of a living being reveals a profound ethical failure. A compassionate society must do better. Declawing is not just a medical issue—it’s a moral one. We owe our animals better than unnecessary pain in exchange for their companionship. We owe them respect for being what they are: cats.
