Retrograde European Union demands animal tests on two cosmetics ingredients

NEWS AND COMMENT: The European Union through the European Chemicals Agency (ECA) have insisted that a German chemicals company, Symrise, conduct animal tests on two ingredients that are only used in cosmetics. They made this demand because of a set of EU rules concerning the registration, authorisation, evaluation and restriction of chemicals.

Retrograde EU wants to animal test for cosmetics
Retrograde EU wants to animal test for cosmetics. Image: Pixabay.
Two useful tags. Click either to see the articles: Toxic to cats | Dangers to cats

It’s in the news because the UK was the first country to ban animal testing for cosmetics in 1998. However, the UK’s Home Office has indicated that it will align with this EU ruling. This would be a dramatically retrograde step in animal welfare.

As a consequence, dozens of cosmetic companies have written to the Home Secretary asking her for a guarantee that there will be no necessity to test beauty products on animals. In all, 70 companies including Waitrose, Boots, Avon, Unilever and others have voiced concerns.

They warned the Home Secretary that the ECA “is now requiring some widely used cosmetic ingredients (and ingredients used in many other types of consumer products) to be tested on hundreds of thousands of animals”.

These companies are concerned that the UK will align with this policy. The companies stated that “It would now appear that the UK is choosing to follow this retrograde approach, including for ingredients used solely in cosmetics and with a history of safe use and manufacture.”

The decision ignores the great advances that have taken place in science and technology to avoid animal testing. There are now non-animal methodologies which can be used to test the safety of products to ensure that they fully comply with UK and EU regulations.

The UK government’s declared policy after leaving the EU was to improve animal welfare because they said that they felt constrained by EU regulations. The UK government thought that they could do better now that they are freed of those regulations. This latest news flies in the face of those intentions.

A Home Office spokesman said that there had been no change in legislation and that the ban on using animals for the testing of finished cosmetic products remains in force.

Comment: this is typical of the EU. The Eurocrats are a bunch of anally-retentive, closed-minded idiots.

SOME MORE ON THIS TOPIC:

Letter to VA challenging them

White Coat Waste Project accuse the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) of brazenly lying to lawmakers on cat experiments

The White Coat Waste Project (WCW) continue to relentlessly pursue the US Department of Veterans Affairs which has wasted American ...
White Coat Waste Project's aim: Stop taxpayer funded animal testing in the USA

White Coat Waste Project effectively lobbies the American government to stop cruel animal testing funded by unwitting taxpayers

White Coat Waste Project's aim: Stop taxpayer funded animal testing in the USA and abroad. Video screenshot. White Coat Waste ...
WCW close US government funded monkey business

WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT ends ALL primate testing and breeding at FDA’s monkey lab

In another stunning success the White Coat Waste Project (WCW) has achieved yet another victory in closing the FDA's biggest ...

Please search using the search box at the top of the site. You are bound to find what you are looking for.

Useful tag. Click to see the articles: Cat behavior
follow it link and logo

Note: sources for news articles are carefully selected but the news is often not independently verified.

I welcome and value comments. Please share your thoughts. All comments are currently unmoderated.

This blog is seen in 199 of the world's country's according to Google Analytics which is pretty much the entire world.

Scroll to Top