Roadkill cats and dogs turned into biofuel

“The council told me my Gemini was broken down, chopped up, cooked and turned to biofuel.” – Veronica McMongale about her lost one-year-old cat Gemini. She lives in Northern Ireland. How widespread is this practice?

Veronica McMonagle with a picture of her cat

Veronica McMonagle with a picture of her cat. Photo: Veronica.

Today the online version of the Mirror newspaper reports something that does not surprise or even shock me because as I have said in the past dead companion animals are financial assets if one looks at them in a purely commercial way. This story reinforces that concept.

We are told that councils (is it commonplace?) are sending the remains of cats and dogs killed on roads to rendering facilities where the end product is fat used as a green alternative to petrol and diesel for farm vehicles and aircraft.

This links in with the campaign to give equal rights under the law in the UK to cats killed on the road by making it obligatory for drivers to report an accident in which they have been involved. This would allow attempts to be made to reunite the remains with her/his owner.

Returning to this uncomfortable story, many cat welfare advocates will be in uproar about this. It is treating cat companions as commercial products. And, yes, on hearing this there will also be many people who are ambivalent about cats or who hate them who will say that cat owners can prevent this by keeping their cats inside. Received and understood.

Mandy Lowe of Cats Matter summed up the feelings of almost all cat guardians when she said:

“First they have to deal with the fact their cat has been hit by a car. Second, it was left in the road. And third the council has come and done this.”

McMonagle lives in Northern Island near the border with the Republic of Ireland. The Derry City and Strabane Council said:

“The remains were scanned to find an identifying chip but, as is often the case with roadkill, no chip was found and it was passed to a third party for rendering.”

Clearly the owner has to take some of the blame for this distressing outcome. She did not microchip. That would have prevented this. She did not keep her cat safe. I understand the issues there though; it’s complicated and in the UK 99% of cat owners let their cats roam outside. However, many people will find the council’s behaviour unconscionable. It is too insensitive. There must be a better way which respects the cat and the owner’s feelings.

The story is a further argument for changing the UK law on cats killed on the road to match that concerning dogs (reporting is mandatory for dogs). There is also a good argument for obligatory microchipping.

HomeAnimal lawsroad traffic accidentsRoadkill cats and dogs turned into biofuel

Are you offended by a domestic cat skin rug?

Well, yes, I am offended, as it happens. It is disrespectful of this cat and cats in general. This is not the first domestic cat skin rug. There are others. There are many wild cat skin rugs, all of which … please continue reading

FB comments (see below)
This entry was posted in road traffic accidents and tagged , , by Michael Broad. Bookmark the permalink.

About Michael Broad

Michael is retired! He retired at age 57 and at Aug 2018 is approaching 70. He worked in many jobs. The last job he did was as a solicitor practicing general law. He loves animals and is passionate about animal welfare. He also loves photography and nature. He hates animal abuse. He has owned and managed this site since 2007. There are around 13k pages so please use the custom search facility!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please try and upload photos that are small in size of max 500px width and 50 KB size. Large images typical of most default settings on digital cameras may fail to upload. Thanks. Comment rules: (1) respect others (2) threatening, harassing, bullying, insulting and being rude to others is forbidden (3) advocating cat cruelty is forbidden (4) trolls (I know who they are) must use real name and upload a photo of themselves. Enforcement: (1) inappropriate comments are deleted before publication and (2) commenters who demonstrate a desire to flout the rules are banned. Failure to comply with (4) results in non-publication. Lastly, please avoid adding links because spam software regards comments with links as spam and holds them in the spam folder. I delete the spam folder contents daily.