Categories: animal abuse

This man needs a taste of his own medicine after he terrifies his cat causing him to pee

This is not hot off the press news (11th March 2020) but it is interesting and sad from a number of perspectives. The story comes from Singapore. In very general terms, a couple owned a ginger tabby cat1. It appears that the cat had been urinating in their apartment, probably out of anxiety. The man in the relationship was filmed by his apparent female partner holding the ginger cat by the scruff of their neck and shouting at the cat. In Mandarin, the man shouted, “If you urinate, I will hit you”.

Man in Singapore terrifies ginger tabby cat causing cat to pee. Screenshot

The ginger cat promptly urinates because he is completely terrified. Bearing in mind this couple’s behaviour it is quite likely that the cat has been constantly terrified for quite a long time. The woman filming his behaviour laughed when the cat peed on the floor. She excitedly zoomed in on the action. I’m sure that she wanted to boost the number of visits to her Instagram page. We don’t know what happened next because the video stops there apparently which I find very strange.

Twitter users rebuke cat abuser

There are two consequences. Firstly the SPCA got involved because it seems that the incident was made known to them via social media that this couple were abusing a ginger tabby cat in their home. Secondly, there was a predictable backlash on social media from people with more common sense and decency than the couple. They wanted some action to take place. Perhaps for the couple to be punished and the cat to be taken from them. Personally I hope that both happened but we don’t know regrettably.

The moral aspect of the story is that punishing a domestic cat can never work and it makes things worse. The relationship deteriorates to the point, as is illustrated here, where the cat is simply constantly anxious and the relationship is totally broken.

There is no doubt in my mind that this would be a crime if the prosecution services took the trouble to do their job. I doubt very much whether it happened.

Finally, you have to comment on the ignorance of this couple who were applying completely inappropriate behaviour towards their cat. Patently ignorant, the couple have no right to own a domestic cat or in any way be associated with companion animals.

Note 1: I have presumed the cat has been taken from them. The report comes from AsiaOne.

Michael Broad

Hi, I'm a 71-year-old retired solicitor (attorney in the US). Before qualifying I worked in a many jobs including professional photography. I have a girlfriend, Michelle. I love nature, cats and all animals. I am concerned about their welfare.

Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

Spaying and neutering is ethical while declawing is not

Sometimes I see the argument that cat declawing is no different from de-sexing; the spaying…

4 hours ago

Persian and Siamese cats rated better pets than non-pedigree cats

This is an interesting study (Turner 1995a) which compared the general interaction between cat guardians…

9 hours ago

Roadside zoo “Wildlife in Need” – further court injunction stopping big cat abuse

Tim Stark owns a controversial Indiana roadside zoo called "Wildlife in Need" (an ironic name…

11 hours ago

Do tigers fight each other?

Yes, sometimes tigers do fight each other at times of flux and tension. The most…

24 hours ago

Stranger in Japan ate cat food for two months without realising it!

This is an amusing story from in which a person honestly admits his or…

1 day ago

Andrew Lloyd Webber is wrong to criticise the movie version of “Cats” the musical

It's all over the news, Andrew Lloyd Webber criticising the movie version of his "Cats"…

1 day ago