UK MPs may challenge EHRC guidelines on single-sex spaces despite clear law

This is another example of the nonsense that occurs routinely in the UK’s Parliament thanks to the current batch of new Labour MPs who are simply too inexperienced and too woke to make good decisions.

In April of 2025 the highest court in the land handed down a definitive judgement on the issue of transgender rights in respect of using single-sex spaces. In short they are to be banned from these spaces because ‘women’ and ‘sex’ are to be defined in terms of biological sex for the purposes of the Equality Act. Simple. Unequivocal. No discussion required.

And yet it appears that Labour MPs are going to challenge in Parliament the EHRC’s (Equality and Human Rights Commission) fresh guidance based in the court’s judgement which is to be submitted to the county’s legislators. Challenged!?

The law is the law. This law is black-and-white. There is no margin in my opinion to discuss the use of single-sex spaces by transgender people. And I want to be clear: I am sympathetic towards transgender people and their rights. They still have a plethora of rights in the UK under a wide range of laws.

It is just that under this Supreme Court judgement schools, hospitals, leisure centres and cinemas will be told to ban transgender women from using single-sex areas, including lavatories and changing rooms, under the EHRC guidance.

The EHRC were encouraged to water down the rules but they rejected these advances for the obvious reason that the law is the law.

And it is time to grasp the nettle of this knotty debate and accept that only biological women are to use women’s toilets and changing rooms and other single-sex areas.

There is not need to debate it further and yet campaigners are determined to try and scupper the changes. They want to reject the law. They will be in breach of the law if they don’t comply.

Some managers in the NHS for instance have rejected the law. They should be sacked in my view.

Transgender rights campaigners have said that the changes will breach their human rights. They intend to bring legal challenges I guess under human rights legislation which is all encompassing and often used as a last resort to try and defeat other legislation.

I am all for human rights but these challenges lead to paralysis and inaction which is another aspect of British legislative processes. Democracy at work can be an ugly sight.

More: transgender