Below are some animal shelter statistics from the Statistic Brain website. The source of the information is Born Free U.S.A., American Humane Society and Pet Finder according to the author.
I’d just like to mention one thing that came to my mind when looking at these statistics. The Humane Society of Ottawa County have announced that they are currently no longer taking in cats and kittens at present. They have at least 130 cats at their shelter. They are full up.
The underlying or main reason given by an humane officer is that people bring in stray and feral cats rather than trapping neutering and spaying these cats and leaving them in the community. Feral and strays make up the majority of the cats at the shelter.
I have three thoughts about that. Firstly, in general we don’t know the percentage of stray, feral and domestic cats at shelters. The figures are not out there. I think they should be. People need figures to get a handle on the problem.
Secondly, if the large majority of cats at shelters are stray and feral, then taking them to a shelter is just a glorified way of killing them based on the chart below (70% of all cats are euthanised).
Thirdly, are the “stray cats” he refers to, straying domestic cats (with homes somewhere) or are they genuine feral cats? I certainly don’t see the point in taking a feral cat to a shelter. A genuine feral cat is unsocialised and therefore does not have a character fit for the family home. On that basis all of them will be killed at the shelter. It would be far more humane of a humane society to organise a trap-neuter-return programme in the community for these cats to make room for homeless domestic cats.
Can’t cat shelters extend their area of operation to places outside the shelter and take proactive steps such as TNR programmes? This is probably a crazy idea but it makes sense to me.
|Animal Shelter Statistics
|Total number of nationwide animal shelters (animal rescue USA map)
|Number of companion animals that enter into animal shelters nationwide annually
|Average annual number of companion animals that are euthanized at shelters
|Percentage of dogs in animals shelters that are euthanized
|Percentage of cats in animal shelters that are euthanized
|Percentage of cats that are returned to their owners
|Percentage of dogs returned to their owners
|Total percentage of dogs claimed to be spayed or neutered
|Total percentage of cats that are claimed to be spayed or neutered
|Total number of animals that end up in a shelter that are spayed or neutered
|Percentage of dogs brought to shelters that were adopted by a shelter
|Percentage of dogs and cats that are adopted from shelters
|Total number of dogs and cats that are purchased at pet stores
|Percentage of people that get their pets free or at low cost
|Cost of taxpayer money annually to round up, house, kill and dispose of homeless animals
|Total percentage of dogs in shelters that are purebred
|Total percentage of U.S. homes who own at least 1 companion animal
|Total number of homes that own at least one companion animal
The percentage of cats returned to their owner is pitifully low (2%) indicating no microchipping and no interest from the owner. It would seem that these owners no longer want to be an owner. The return rate for dogs is 7 times better. Why? Dog owners seem more concerned.
The cost to the taxpayer is $2,000,000,000 annually. Do we know of government run trap-neuter-return schemes (TNR). All or nearly all the ones I read about are privately run by volunteers, kind people who are occasionally persecuted by local governments. Wouldn’t it make sense if some of the $2bn of taxpayer’s money was diverted to preventative measures, which is what TNR is.
Shelters are a reaction to the problem of unwanted cats. There needs to be more pro-action: preventative measures.
Please search using the search box at the top of the site. You are bound to find what you are looking for.