Use of iconic wild animals in pop culture gives the impression that they are not endangered

Charismatic, iconic animals such as the tiger, lion, elephant, leopard, giraffe, panda, cheetah, polar bear, grey wolf and gorilla are used extensively in what is described as “pop culture”. This means things such as plush toys, animated films, school questionnaires, marketing, cartoons, selfies and zoo websites.

As people are unaware of the true conservation status of these iconic wild animals they are given the impression, in the numerous references to them in pop culture, that all is well in reality when it is not.

In France, for example, a baby toy giraffe called Sophie sold 800,000 times which represents eight times more than the total number of giraffes living in Africa.

The lead author of the study conducted by American and French researchers and published in the journal PLOS Biology, Frank Courchamp, of the University of Paris, said that the animals are so popular in pop culture that they create a “virtual population” in the mind of the average citizen giving the impression that the animals are doing far better in the real world than they are.

The researchers want companies who use these animals in marketing to donate a proportion of their income to their conservation. One of the researchers, William Ripple, said that the major threat facing nearly all these animals is direct killing by humans. This is incorrect.

The major threat to all these animals and all endangered wild animals is loss of habitat to which you can add things such as poaching for body parts et cetera. Sometimes the population size becomes so low that extinction is almost certain due to inbreeding resulting in infertile breeding adults.

On a personal level, it is clear to me that whereas a cat lover might have a high interest in domestic cats and their behaviour and welfare they infrequently have the same concern for their wild cat cousins.

It is very hard to generate interest in the general population. Of course there are individuals who are extremely interested in conservation but by-and-large the concern is not there. Add to that the underlying problem referred to in this article and you can see why there is a gradual (sometimes step) decline in the population sizes of iconic wild species such as tiger, lion, elephant and many others.

Source: The Guardian via Big Cat Rescue on Facebook.

Facebook Discussion
This entry was posted in Cat Products and tagged by Michael Broad. Bookmark the permalink.

About Michael Broad

Michael is retired! He retired at age 57 and at Aug 2018 is approaching 70. He worked in many jobs. The last job he did was as a solicitor practicing general law. He loves animals and is passionate about animal welfare. He also loves photography and nature. He hates animal abuse. He has owned and managed this site since 2007. There are around 13k pages so please use the custom search facility!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please try and upload photos that are small in size of max 500px width and 50 KB size. Large images typical of most default settings on digital cameras may fail to upload. Thanks. Comment rules: (1) respect others (2) threatening, harassing, bullying, insulting and being rude to others is forbidden (3) advocating cat cruelty is forbidden (4) trolls (I know who they are) must use real name and upload a photo of themselves. Enforcement: (1) inappropriate comments are deleted before publication and (2) commenters who demonstrate a desire to flout the rules are banned. Failure to comply with (4) results in non-publication. Lastly, please avoid adding links because spam software regards comments with links as spam and holds them in the spam folder. I delete the spam folder contents daily.