An Example of How Prosecuting Authorities Treat People and Cats Differently

This is a short note demonstrating how prosecuting authorities treat domestic cats and humans differently. The standard of care required is obviously lower for cats than for people. That would not surprise anybody probably but this is quite a nice example which emphasises the fact.

111 cats in condemned home USA
111 cats in condemned home USA

A couple lived in a condemned property with 111 cats and a child. The couple have been prosecuted for the neglect of a dependent (the child). The child has been placed into the care of the Child Protective Services. The charge for neglect of a dependent is being made because of the living conditions in the house.

As for the cats, a photograph indicates that the house of the complete mess and inadequate for either person or cat. All the cats have been rounded up and removed for adoption. They have been placed in foster care and shelters for rehoming.

But the couple have not being prosecuted for failing to provide adequately for their cats and keeping their cats in a way which is detrimental to the welfare.

The source of the story does not tell us any other facts about how they cared for their child and their cats. But as mentioned the criticism comes from the wholly inadequate living conditions and that applies to both cats and child. It is almost certain that both child and cats were living in an environment which was liable to be injurious to their health.

I feel pretty sure that this couple would have failed the test as set out in the UK’s Animal Welfare Act 2006 as to the provision of care required when keeping domestic cats. Common sense would come to the same conclusion.

Source.

3 thoughts on “An Example of How Prosecuting Authorities Treat People and Cats Differently”

  1. The author of the best comment will receive an Amazon gift of their choice at Christmas! Please comment as they can add to the article and pass on your valuable experience.
  2. The child, ofcourse, is another story. Depending on his age, he has now learned that life is of no value as evidenced by the neglected cats. His self-worth is in the toilet. He may, assuredly, become an animal abuser.
    But, is his sorry life worth any more that any other neglected/abused creature? Ofcourse not.
    All are equal and deserving of a safe and fulfilling life.
    I’m not religious by any means; but, I believe that all creatures were placed here for a purpose and have the same rights as any other, which includes freedom and the ability to live without fear.
    What will it take until we get it?

    Reply
  3. I would be shocked if these cats were, actually, placed in a safe environment and up for adoption.
    I smell an animal control situation call. Kill shelters call themselves SHELTERS like many others.
    I would bet $$ that 90% of these sweet cats are dead today.

    Reply
  4. It would be interesting to know in which state in the U.S.these crimes take place. Most states have W & I (Welfare and Institutions) codes that cover these types of crimes involving both people and animals.

    I am happy to see that the cats have been taken to shelters, and are available for adoption.

    What a tragic situation.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

follow it link and logo