This a dowloadable app (application or program) that is for the iPhone and iPad. It is called Hackycat. It is a computer game for handheld devices. You can play it on these devices to keep yourself amused while you’re on the bus or train or killing time. It cost $0.99 to download.
The game is described as:
Save really cute cats from exploding. By kicking them.
The way you kick the cats is by tapping the screen. These devices, as you know, have touch sensitive screens. You keep the cats in the air by continually kicking them and if a cat hits the ground the game is over. The game is also over, if you hit a “bird bomb” as it flies by.
Here is a video demo:
The graphics are good. They are by Ken Wong and the game was created by him as well.
That is what it is. Now, the question I have is this: “Is it an acceptable game for kids?” I am not going to prejudge and condemn because I’m probably acquiring a reputation as a grumpy old curmudgeon. I am not, but I do struggle to find these sorts of games and videos acceptable.
My personal view is that they might encourage cat abuse and cruelty. I am one of those people who believe that TV and film violence encourages real violence. I realise this is a hot and never ending debate and there are arguments on both sides. However, I believe that continually bombarding young people with images, both still and moving (movies) of violence of any kind, gradually alters the person’s perceptions of violence and distorts the immorality of gratuitous violence. The same can be said of magazines showing super slender girls. I believe that these images puts pressure on girls to be unnaturally slim which can lead to mental health problems (anorexia, for example).
I think in this instance Hackycat is particularly insensitive because there are specific cases of kids kicking cats and killing cats in this way. It is almost as if the idea for the game is based on real life experiences or news stories.
Ken Wong probably wanted to, somehow, incorporate the obsession with funny cat videos and cheeseburger still images into a game (cheeseburgers also feature in the game). It is a game that attempts to cash in on the funny cat video/image cult, which is fading in my opinion, thankfully.
If you have got this far, you’ll understand my ideas about this game; in summary: it should not be on sale. What do you think? I respect other people’s views completely.
Note: if the video goes dead for some reason this is a screenshot:
That is what I think it is too. A version of exploiting cats. It is a cheap exploitation too as it is combination of cheeseburger cats (funny pics with captions) and funny cat videos. The more I think of it the more I dislike it. Apple shouldn’t sell it. I don’t think Apple are doing themselves any good by being associated with this. Companies need to take a more moral stance.
I researched this a bit and it would seem even the people publicising the game admit there is animal cruelty involved and that although it’s not right they still think the game is fun. It would seem nobody takes virtual violence seriously anymore.
Personally I hope the idiot who had the stupid idea of making this game drops dead in his sleep. What a total moron. What a cheap way to cash in on cats. I guess he will get alot of bad publicity over it and deserves every bit of it. Personally I think it’s appalling.
Agreed. If the person is disturbed then games and videos can gradually push that person towards violence. That is what I believe.
I agree with you Michael Sometimes with these games reality can become blurred. As with any violence thats available for public viewing I just think that violence begets violence (depending on the person/kid). For example I could watch a film about a murder and would give it no more thought yet another person who already had violent tendencies may look to carry out what he/her had seen on the screen.
I think its the same with this a child with little or no parental control may watch this and think ‘hey this is fun, wonder if it would be better with a real cat?!’ sorry perhaps I’m wrong but I just think its a definite possibility.